2014 Nov 20 8:00 PM
Hi experts,
What is the benefit of handling the disconnection process (triggered from dunning) with the new transaction FPWLMN in comparison with the traditional approach of using the FM ISU_DUNNING_BLOCK_DEVICE_0350?
Thanks!
Mario.
2014 Nov 20 8:37 PM
Mario:
One is for dunning, and the other is not for dunning. You cannot process dunning disconnections using transaction FPWLMN and vice-versa. FPWLMN is designed to handle remote ami disconnections/reconnections which are triggered outside of dunning.
regards,
bill.
2014 Nov 20 8:37 PM
Mario:
One is for dunning, and the other is not for dunning. You cannot process dunning disconnections using transaction FPWLMN and vice-versa. FPWLMN is designed to handle remote ami disconnections/reconnections which are triggered outside of dunning.
regards,
bill.
2014 Nov 20 10:55 PM
Hi Mario,
FPWLMN (Manage WOrklists for Disconnection Notifications) is used for remote disconnection for Smart / AMI meters. In the process we have configured, we release the contract accounts / disconnection docs which gets picked by the batch job for remote disconnection.
Thanks,
Ajay