SEPA_XML file / note to payee

[Former Member]

Hello everyone,

I am having issue trying to configure a SEPA_DD XML file, specialy the tag <EndtoEndId> in PaymentIdentification and the tag <Unstructured> in remittance information.

First, could you confirm my understanding on these points:

The EndtoEndIT tag is the reference that will be back in case of R-transactions

The Unstructured field is the note to payee that will appear on the bank account of the debitor

Secondly, we are using FI-CA so using transaction FQP5 to configure note to payee (we are not using PMW).

This seems to be linked in DMEE with the following structure field :

Structure: DMEE_PAYD

Field name: TEXT

I cannot link the note to payee (FQP5) to this mapping (DMEE_PAYD/TEXT): The customizing in FQP5 seems correct as we did not change it compare to our previous file format but nothing is filled in the XML file when generated.(see the file attached)

Would anyone have an idea on this customizing?

Thank you,

Anaïs

[raymond_meulman · Accepted solution]

Dear Guillaume,

Maybe it helps: We use &FPAYH-DOC1R+4(10)& where you use &FPAYH-DOC1R&.

Regards,

Raymond

[Former Member]

Dear Raymond,

Thank you for your answer.

However, I have tried with this note to payee but it does not seem to work, nothing gets into the XML file. I am sure I am missing something but i don't know what.

Could you tell me if you have the same customizing:

- I have linked the note to payee customised in FQP5 with the payment method in FQP1

- In the DMEE file, EndtoEnd tag is mapped with the following structure field:

Structure: DMEE-PAYD

Field name: TEXT

Is there another customization to do?

Thank you for your help,

Regards,

Anaïs

[raymond_meulman]

Dear Anaïs,

Please check whether the EndToEndId is mapped to:

1) PAYD2; and

2) NOTPROVIDED

You probably refer to PAYD2.

Could you check that the mapping is done with

Structure: DMEE_PAYD

Field name: TEXT

Key field: 2

To track whether the payment note is at all being filled in the payment details / t_payment_details (which are being used to populate the XML file), you can put a breakpoint in the FM FI_PAYMEDIUM_DMEE_30 and track the value of t_payment_details-text. This should contain the value of the EndToEndId, when the T_PAYMENT_DETAILS-TYPE is '2'.

Hope this helps you a bit.

Regards,

Raymond

[Former Member]

Dear Raymond,

Thank you very much for your helpful answer; the error was in the key field of the DMEE tree!!

I have another question related to this mapping.

We would like to map XBLNR which is the invoice reference number in the XML tree. This field is available in the SAP standard mapping under the structure FPAYP, however, it is not possible to map it as it is not a FI-CA object and thus not displayed in structure PAYP where the data are taken.

Did you already meet this kind of specification?

Thank you,

Regards,

Anaïs

[raymond_meulman]

Dear Anaïs,

Not realy familiar with this question. I would say that the field XBLNR in FPAYP should be populated by the payment program (e.g. regup). If it is not filled from the payment program, then it will not have a value.

In the PAYM tree (transaction DMEE) should be able to assign any node to the XBLNR field in the structure FPAYP…

I hope it is of use.

Regards,

Raymond

[Former Member]

Dear Raymond,

Thanks again for your help.

SAP is going to fix the issue in order to be able to map this field into FI structure (PAYP-REF1R => FPAYP-XBLNR)

However, I am wondering if FQP5 has to be customized if SAP standard in DMEE is sufficiant. Indeed, in transaction DMEE, if the field I need to map in this tag are available, do I need to use FQP5 for note to payee? Do you know the added value of this transaction?

Thank you very much,

Regards,

Anaïs