2013 Jan 20 7:00 AM
Facing error while Using INST_MGMT in ECC 6 EHP 6 version. However the same is working fine with EHP 5 version.The error message says "Enter Rate type".We have rate type applicable only at Register level and the same is supplied in the input file.
With some suggested config change, the error message changes to "Not all meter reading results are entered"
Anybody came across sucha situation in EHP 6 version.Need urgent help.
2013 Jan 22 10:53 AM
Hi Felix,
We need to also pass meter reading during device install. It is mandatory field and we cannot suppress it. You need to pass meter reading in either AUTO_ZW-ZWSTANDCA or AUTO_ZW-ZWSTANDCE.
Regards,
Avinash
2013 May 30 2:34 PM
Hi guru's,
I am also facing the same problem with INST_MGMT, The error message says "Enter Rate type".We have rate type applicable only at Register level and the same is supplied in the input file.
the Automatic structure and fields are
INTERFACE -ACTION
ANLAGE
DEVLOC
EADAT
AUTO_ZW- ANZDAYSOFP
ANZERG
EQUNRE
KONDIGRE
PERVERBR
TARIFART
ZWNUMMERE
ZWSTANDCA
ZWSTANDCE
AUTO_GER- ACTION
DEVLOC
GERAETNEU
GERWECHS
MATNR
And OK CODE, CONTAINER are activated
Can you please let me know by what config change can i remove this error.
Thanx in advance .
Regards,
Hemanth
2013 Jun 06 6:06 AM
Folks, if you are still getting the "Enter Rate Type" message during the load (after supplying a value for the Rate type field),, then please check and ensure that the input file has data for all "expected" registers per the Register group setting on the Device/Meter.
For eg. If a meter is assigned to a Register Group that has 2 registers, then ensure that the input file is supplied with data for two DI_ZW structures - each corresponding to the registers expected. This is assuming that the error is only in the register level data.
Please check and try that out and I think that shoukd resolves your error. If not, please provide a sample data file, with RG info from the meter.
Regards,
Ash
2013 Jun 06 2:27 PM
hi ash,
Thanks for the response .. In-fact the problem is from the side of field structure which i have configured. Now it has been changed as a result the issue has been resolved.
Regards,
Hemanth