CAX-Define Transactions for External Bank Statement Transfer

[Former Member]

Hallo,

We have a transaction named 116 in which no interpretation rules defined in CAX. I mean SPRO-> Financial Accounting(New)-> Contract Account Receivables and Payable -> Business Transactiobs->Payments->Process Incoming and Outgoing Methods -> Define Transactions for Electronic Bank statement Transfer. Here I mean we did not include saying whether it is a Return or Incoming payment Method.

My First Question, how come the system took this transaction in payment lot eventhough it is not maintained as stated in the above settings.

but for this transaction 116, in FI->OT83 Posting rules were for the transaction 116 to the correspondent GL Account.

Now we don't want this position in Payment Lot with out touching the posting rules in FI. How can this be achieved?

Thanks a lot in advance!

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Lakshmi,

The reason for item taken to payment lot might be the mapping for transaction external code as payment lot in configuration

SPRO->Financial Accounting (New)->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable->Business Transactions->Payments->Processing Incoming and Outgoing Payments->Define Transactions for Electronic Bank Statement Transfer.

Regards,

Lalit

[Former Member]

Hi Lalit,

Thanks for your reply. As I stated above, we have not maintained the configuration as stated above but still the external transaction was in the payment lot.

Where can it go wrong?

[Former Member]

Hi Lakshmi,

Can you please check configuration for Global setting for Electronic bank statement.

in below path

SPRO->Financial Accounting (New)->Bank Accounting->Business Transactions->Payment Transactions->Electronic Bank Statement->Make Global Settings for Electronic Bank Statement

Here check your bank statement code is mapped against posting rule which is for payment lot transfer.

Regards,

Lalit

[Former Member]

Hi Lalit,

I am glad for your reply. Here the Posting rules were defined for the external transaction. The requiremen is as stated above

"but for this transaction 116, in FI->OT83 Posting rules were for the transaction 116 to the correspondent GL Account.

Now we don't want this position in Payment Lot with out touching the posting rules in FI. How can this be achieved?

They dont want to touch the posting in FI but in CAX we dont want to interpret that in Payment lot. I was assuming if it is not defined in Account receivables and payables then this transaction will not considered in CAX.

Please explain the process difference by defining additionally in CAX.

Thanks in advance!

[Former Member]

Solution:- Posting rule was changed so that not to have the posting in subledger CAX.