2014 Dec 08 6:41 AM
Hi
Scenario
Step 1 creation of PR for service 100 @ 9 = 900 (Commitment Updated with 900 under PR)
Step 2 creation of PO for service 100 @ 8 = 800 (Commitment Updated with 800 under PO and reduction has done only for 800)
My current budget usage is still 900 and it has not reduced to 800
Please help
Lincy
2014 Dec 08 7:50 AM
Hi,
The system behaves correctly. Why would you expect reduction of commitment to 800. You have PR of 900 and PO of 800, but you can still have another PO for 100. Out of the actions described above budget consumption should remain on the level of 900, i.e. 800 of PO + 100 remaining of PR.
Regards,
Eli
2014 Dec 08 7:50 AM
Hi,
The system behaves correctly. Why would you expect reduction of commitment to 800. You have PR of 900 and PO of 800, but you can still have another PO for 100. Out of the actions described above budget consumption should remain on the level of 900, i.e. 800 of PO + 100 remaining of PR.
Regards,
Eli
2014 Dec 08 7:57 AM
Thank Eli for your reply. But I have completely used the PR quantity and I cannot create a new PO based on the old PR. I have done only a price change in PO from 9 to 8
So budget usage in this case is more by 100
Actual budget usage after PO creation should be 800
Lincy
2014 Dec 08 7:59 AM
How come completely? You had 9 and PO is on 8. But, in any case, even if you use it completely, it will reduce commitment if UoM is defined in this way, i.e. commitments are managed by quantity and not by amount.
2014 Dec 08 8:06 AM
Hi Eli
PR and Po qty is 100. only the rate changed from 9 to 8
Lincy
2014 Dec 08 8:11 AM
I see I thought, 9 is the quantity. In this case, check if UoM used in PR is defined to work with quantities and not amounts (CUNI).
2014 Dec 08 8:13 AM
2014 Dec 08 8:15 AM
Then it explains it Commitment is reduced on value basis and not on quantity basis.
2014 Dec 08 8:21 AM
No Eli. I changed the UoM settings. Still the same result. Please help
Lincy
2014 Dec 08 8:22 AM
You changed it and reproduced the scenario? Because, naturally, it won't correct retroactively the figures.
2014 Dec 08 8:24 AM
2014 Dec 08 9:31 AM
2014 Dec 09 5:58 AM
Hi,
Please refer to SAP Note: 634298 - FAQ- Commitment update in Service.
Please check ML91, 2 fields are relevant for commitment update for Service PRs and POs.
Please set it and will solve this. I too faced the same issue and solved using this note
Sunoj