2014 Nov 17 9:43 AM
Dear Sapient
Functionality of budget reduction during down payment
Case 1
Created PO with two line item 10 & 20 with value 36,400.00 for each line item total PO value 72800
while doing transaction F-47 user enter line item 10 with total value 72800 system reduced 72800 from line item 10 but rest 36400 amount in line item 20 value revert back to respective department , generally it will be a problem to create f-47 line item wise. Configuration done mentioned below
Budget Control System (BCS) - Availability Control - Settings for Availability Control Ledger - Define Filter Settings for Commitment/Actual Values = value type
58 | Down Payment Requests |
61 | Down Payments |
Is there any config so that system will not ask budget during F-47,F-48 and MIRO (please guide about standard functionality of budget for down payment process with reference to purchase order multiple line item case )
Budget category - PAYMENT
Budget profile - 101
Please guide
Thanks and regards
SSB
2014 Nov 17 10:51 AM
2014 Nov 17 10:51 AM
2014 Nov 27 12:59 PM
Hi Eli
I am using updating profile 000101 so does this note required. Shall i change the profile from 101 to 305
budget category - payment
2014 Nov 27 1:22 PM
I believe, you can still implement the note with your profile.
2014 Dec 10 11:35 AM
Thanks a lot Eli working fine waiting for just user confirmation before moving to production client
2015 Feb 21 7:41 AM
Hi Eli
Above SAP note working fine but after implementation of note user facing different problem with other are mentioned below
1.Partial advance payment - In production client purchaser order created earlier (Before SAP note implemented) and partial advance payment made against the PO and while user going for advance payment for remaining value system showing budget exceed during advance payment.
2. FMRP_RW_BUDCON - Before implementation of SAP note All down payment request and down payment line item was coming in report when you all click Search actual line items document in consumed budget column. But after note implementation report does not showing the down payment line item against purchase order for old posted document.
3.One issue raised by user i.e system showing budget exceed error message during service entry sheet. Advance payment has been made before sap note implemented now user creating the service entry sheet system showing budget exceed message as per our configuration there is no such budget control during service entry sheet /MIGO.
4. FMRP_RW_BUDCON - available amount column showing negative value for few fund center due to this user unable to post the MIRO document.
Does this problem arise due to implementation of SAP note.
please look in to the issue
Thanks & regards
Sasanka
2015 Feb 23 4:28 AM
Hi,
Please try to use FMAVCREINIT once then check the report.
Regards,
Ankit K. Agarwal
2015 Feb 23 6:29 AM
Thanks ankit
as referred to your message will it create any problem if i will run the t code in production server.
actually after implementing the note error showing in every fund center.
please advice as error is coming in MIRO also and report showing negative
2015 Feb 23 7:09 AM
Hi,
You have to this tcode in PRD server itself. It is advised to run this tcode, when no other user is log in server.
Regards,
Ankit K. Agarwal
2015 Feb 23 3:47 PM
Sasanka,
After implementing Modif. Note 1126105, old PO's need reconstruction with transaction FMN4N (see note 189761).
Last steps are FMAF and FMAVCREINIT. And yes, reconstruction must be done out of business hours.
best regards
Mar
2015 Feb 23 4:58 PM
Dear Mar
Thanks for your reply
I need suggestion as related to my scenario -
I have already implemented the note 1126105 in production system , but yet not did all the activity as you mentioned in your reply
what will be my next activity. shall i do all the activity as mentioned by you and as per note 189761?
please suggest
Regards
sasanka
2015 Feb 24 5:12 AM
Dear Ankit,MAR & ELI
One suggestion required regarding using below mention tcode in production client
Reconstruction from FI documents: RFFMRPFI (FMN0)
Reconstruction from parked MM invoices: RFFMRP08 (FMN1)
Reconstruction from purchase requisition documents: RFFMRP34N (FMN3N)
Reconstruction from purchase order documents: RFFMRP02N (FMN4N)
Reconstruction from earmarked funds: RFFMRP03N (FMN5N)
Reconstruction from parked FI documents: RFFMRP04 (FMR0)
Reconstruction from CO documents: RFFMRP05 (FMB0)
Reconstruction from trips: RPR_CORRECT_COMMITMENT
And also FMAVCREINIT , FMAF
1.from above all the tcode needs to be run or only FMAVCREINIT is sufficient?
2.shall i run purchaser order, requisition parked MM invoice and after that FMAVCREINIT is also required to run?
3.Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values)
As per point no 3 i need one clarification sap transaction running in production is a continuous process , hence shall i run the transaction during off time of FM update related transaction only like PR,PO and FI posting or all transaction should be stopped during reconstruction.
Thanks & regards
sasank
2015 Feb 24 8:04 AM
Hi,
a) As stated by Mar, FMN4N is to be executed for reconstruction of POs.
b) FMAF, normally, is not necessary after running FMN4N
c) FMAVCREINIT cannot harm your system and you'd better to execute it. It is advisable to schedule it, when no activities are being performed. Though, even if they are, the maximum 'danger' is that these transactions would be blocked.
d) If you have flexible budgetary system; where budget addresses are changing frequently, it is even advisable to run FMAVCREINIT on regular basis. For more info, check note 725266.
Regards,
Eli