SAP for Media Discussions
Spark conversations about content creation, audience engagement, and monetization strategies using SAP in the media industry. Join in the discussion!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Behavior of DFKKOP table for autocleared and nonautoclear BPs

Former Member
0 Kudos
1,030
  • SAP Managed Tags:

Hi FI-CA gurus,

I've noticed that there are some differences in the DFKKOP table for those items that were reversed with autoclearing versus those that were reversed and nonautocleared but processed via FP06. For autocleared, the business partner items do not appear in the DFKKOP table at all. For those non-autoclear items, even if they were manually cleared, they still appear in DFKKOP. Even the display of the BPs look different in FPE3.  Is this controlled by configuration or is this standard behavior?

See screens in link

http://www.filefactory.com/file/71h6oe9mqvx1/n/Reversed_nonautoclear_then_cleared_docx

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

william_eastman
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos
236
  • SAP Managed Tags:

Catherine:

the behavior you are seeing is standard.  It depends on the situation when the transaction is processed.  While not exactly the same, i can best describe the behavior using payments as analogy:

An open item exists $10 debit.  A payment is made for $10 which clears that open debit. If you then display the payment document in FPE3, then you would see it similar to what your second scenario looks like.  The payment has a DFKKKO entry but no DFKKOP entry.  The payment document is referenced in DFKKOP via the AUGBL field. 

If however no open item exists and a payment is made, then it would look more like the first scenario. There would be a DFKKKO entry and a DFKKOP entry for the payment document. 

regards,

bill.

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4

william_eastman
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos
237
  • SAP Managed Tags:

Catherine:

the behavior you are seeing is standard.  It depends on the situation when the transaction is processed.  While not exactly the same, i can best describe the behavior using payments as analogy:

An open item exists $10 debit.  A payment is made for $10 which clears that open debit. If you then display the payment document in FPE3, then you would see it similar to what your second scenario looks like.  The payment has a DFKKKO entry but no DFKKOP entry.  The payment document is referenced in DFKKOP via the AUGBL field. 

If however no open item exists and a payment is made, then it would look more like the first scenario. There would be a DFKKKO entry and a DFKKOP entry for the payment document. 

regards,

bill.

0 Kudos
236
  • SAP Managed Tags:

Hi Bill,

Thanks for that explanation. In the instance that let's say it is manually cleared or matched against another open item, it would still have the same table behavior in DFKKOP or is it expected to match 2nd scenario where there is payment entry in DFKKKO but no DFKKOP?

Cat

0 Kudos
236
  • SAP Managed Tags:

Cat:

Manual clearing would be executed with an existing credit document and an existing debit.  Each of those documents has DFKKKO and DFKKOP entries.  The clearing would be executed and a third, new document is created.  This clearing document will exist in DFKKKO but will not have its own entry in DFKKOP.  The clearing document number would be referenced as the clearing document for both of the original open items in AUGBL.

regards,

bill.

0 Kudos
236
  • SAP Managed Tags:

Thanks Bill. That explains a lot