If you are unlucky enough to be diagnosed with a cancer tomorrow, you will be treated with one or a combination of these 3 techniques:
At some point in the future, generations will look back on these techniques with the same pity as we have today when we recall the use of leeches in medicine.
If 1 million people have lung cancer, 1 million have prostate cancer and 1 million have breast cancer then it is highly unlikely there is a single cure for cancer. Based on our current knowledge it seems more likely that there will be 3 million cures for these 3 million patients as the development of the cancer and the response of the body to our best current techniques will be different in every body.
In his recent book, “The End of Illness”, David Agus argues that current medicine developed to treat invading viruses and bacteria in the body. The invader was identified with symptoms and the treatment prescribed. However, cancer is no invader. It is caused by a regular process going awry in the body and not being halted by all of the automatic checks and balances that our body does so well without us even knowing it day in and day out. Any other auto-immune disorder and many more conditions could be grouped with cancer as an “internal error”. In these cases, and with human health in general, a treatment for one condition could lead to complications elsewhere in the body. We begin tinkering with an outrageously complex system that we do not completely understand. There is a need for medicine to be more personalised.
The human genome has been mapped and represents Gb of data. In every single cell in our body. The genome and it’s awesome scale is not even the finest level of detail we can measure in the body . The genome is referred to by David and others now as “like an ingredient list at a restaurant” in the sense that you can see obvious issues (like the use of MSG or way too much salt or sugar compared with fruit and vegetables) but the way in which those ingredients are combined in the “restaurants” of every body will differ widely. The gene for growing a neck is the same in a mouse as it is in a giraffe, it is just switched on for longer in a giraffe. These switches are then as important as the genome itself. Our genes express themselves by producing proteins which control everything in our bodies from neck growth to the overall health of the system so now we must measure and observe all of the proteins in the body. This is the Proteome and the volume of data here is potentially more vast than the genome.
So given the need to analyse the genome and proteome, we no longer have a medical challenge but an IT and engineering challenge. Medicine can now be aided by tools capable of processing large volumes of data quickly. HANA is well placed to establish a strong role in the new era of personalised medicine. Here are some thoughts and observations on the potential for HANA and Personalised Medicine:
Mark Heff
SAP CSA EMEA
26 July 2012
See also:
Blog: Genome Analysis
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.