on 2010 Dec 30 7:21 PM
Just for fun...
Where What Why SoD Custom Codes
UK 4.6C & Basis Support Package 59 for 4.6C I have no idea Unknown 1500+
D'oh - please can this be moved? I thought I was in the coffee corner
Edited by: David Berry on Dec 30, 2010 7:24 PM
Request clarification before answering.
Interesting thread.
I was involved in a 4.0b tot 4.7 upgrade in 2006.
And an SRM3.0 upgrade to 5.0 in the middle of 2007.
After that most systems I worked on were fairly up to date.
Well apart from my previous contract where they were on ECC but on an extremely low support package, which caused a lot of workflow issues and bapis not working.
Cheers, Rob.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
I've found going back in time to an older system to be 'fun' in some parts - not quite gone back to activity groups but does have that radio valves feel now and then...that and seeing 12 years of naming conventions for custom tcodes and roles.
That and the sheer number of custom codes and bdc's built...certainly not vanilla
Regards
David
>
> That and the sheer number of custom codes and bdc's built...certainly not vanilla
That almost sounds like the same customer I was talking about. The vast amount of customization (and yes, including BDCs) was a major factor in their implementing a brand new dinosaur system.
I knew something was amiss on my first day when I walked past a server room and saw [these things|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_tape_data_storage#Open_reels] rather nostalgically [hanging around|http://etherealmind.com/data-centre-tape-rack-half-inch/].
Not the oldest, but a future candidate:
Three years ago I worked at a new implementation project that went live with 4.7. Their go live date was somewhere around 6 weeks before SAP officially ended regular 4.7 support.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I work with a client where we had an upgrade from 4.5B to ECC6.0 on 31.12.2007.
in fact we still have a 3.5H system, i am told that the system is kept up and running due to a legal requirement where they need to store the financial data for the past 15 or 20 years.........it feels strange but i didnt want to question on that, i would be a dead duck if they ask me to support it
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.