My content has been rejected

[vamshi_mohan]

Hi,

I have posted a content. I got few inputs.

Meanwhile I found the solution. I posted the solution too.

I was surprised to see that my content has been rejected and made unavailable. I have gone through the rules but could not find a suitable reason which makes my post inappropriate or rejectable.

I would like to understand what went wrong to avoid repeating.

Could anyone kindly check and let me know..

content link is : http://scn.sap.com/thread/3563091

Warm regards,

Vamshi.

[JL23 · Accepted solution]

I just used your subject to search SCN:

Doesn't this say more than any moderator note?

The rules ask to search before posting.

Of course a small note could have cleared all doubts and could have avoided this discussion.

If someone had clicked alert moderator with failed to search and the moderator agrees, then the content is hidden, no matter if there were already answers. Answers do no prevent a FAQ from being rejected. Such discussions do not add any value to SCN if the same Q&A is already available in hundred other discussions.

[JasonLax · Accepted solution]

I did not find any notes but it does seem that this is a frequently asked question that can be resolved by using search.  Unless, of course, you have demonstrated that you have searched and still haven't found an answer on something particular about the issue.

[matt · Accepted solution]

That's right, it's a FAQ. I think it was probably me. I'm fairly consistent in adding a note giving reason, but seem to have forgotten in this case. My apologies.

[Former Member]

hi,

Even my content got rejected without a specific reason for rejection..

I had posted material aging report.

Arati

[matt]

Well, in your case it wasn't me. But I can tell you it was rejected because there are plenty of material aging reports already in existence, it's using old style coding techniques such as REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY. It's more suitable for a wiki, but I'd reject it there as well on the grounds that it isn't new.

You say "I want to contribute some contents for freshers," While this is a laudable aim, I've heard it many times, and to me it means "I want to post something pretty basic". The fact is that most basic topics have been covered many times. Why not try to post something that's novel and hasn't been covered before? That's far more useful to the community.

[Former Member]

Thanks For your reply. I will take care of it in future.

Regards,

Arati

[vamshi_mohan]

Thank you all for your inputs.

I have spent most of the time yesterday searching for a solution related to my content in all the search results available. But could not find a suitable one.

It is right that the title of the content has a several hits but not the content. The scenario is certainly a different one. I think moderation shall be more easy if there is an automated validation process for titles before they get posted. This, I think would be a leaner approach.

Best regards,

Vamshi.

[JasonLax]

Hi Vamshi,

Just be very clear and specific with your query:if it's too vague and lacks details, the moderators may again assume its a repeat of an existing thread.

Jason

[Jitendra_Kansal]

Hi Vamshi,

I dont know what was your thread about. But make you follow "SCN Rules of Engagement"

http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-18590

Also, in the "Notification" section ( right hand side at top) you would have got one notification where moderator should have mentioned the reason for rejecting that thread. did you check it?

Rgrds,

JK

[vamshi_mohan]

Hi JK,

No such information. All I have is as in the attached image.

[Jitendra_Kansal]

By looking at the screenshot seems like moderator had to reject your post for violating RoE.

maybe can give more inputs.

Rgrds,

JK