on 2014 Feb 25 9:45 PM
As we know, some content gets featured regularly on the SCN home page. It seems reasonable to think the featured content would be "recommended reading" (and I might be off here), but there was a case previously when a plagiarized blog was featured and the one running right now has only 3-star rating. So makes me wonder... Could someone please shed the light on how the content becomes featured and what is the purpose?
Thank you.
Request clarification before answering.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi there
, and Former Member edit the SCN homepages with help and input from others.
I am guessing you refer to the blog: and I looked at the publishing date, Feb. 8th. As few of us are subject matter experts in the deepe...
Again, your vigilence is always much appreciated.
Thank you, Tammy, Marilyn and Catherine for the replies! Glad to learn that it's not just a random pick.
Would it make sense to also reach to the space moderators for a quick check before featuring a blog or document? I can't imagine any of the ABAP moderators recommending the blog in question. I'm not actually an expert either, but we can usually get a better understanding from several opinions.
Also perhaps the content created by the members who recently joined or have little "track record" calls for a bit more scrutiny? Certainly we all have seen the new SCN members (or the ones who joined a while ago but haven't blogged before) creating great content, but overall, unfortunately, the lower quality content tends to originate from such members. (This is my own observation though, not supported by statistically significant evidence.) Just a thought...
Thanks again!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jelena,
As Marilyn and Tammy state, Audrey Stevenson, Talila Baron and I rotate curating content for the homepage.
I appreciate you pointing out that one of the blogs was not up to par. After further review, we all agree that it should be (and will be) removed from the homepage.
Thanks again. It's great to have such dedicated contributors who can help us weed out the sub-par content.
Best regards,
Catherine
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.