critera for getting in

[Former Member]

last week i saw one job opening in sap labs and the eligiblity critera for that was

canditate should have above 60 percent throught out his schooling and in higer education like degree or in masters apart from good techincal knowledge.

my question is it the marks we have scored in schools judge our potential.

i might not have good academic record in my school but i have been pretty good in sap mm (although i am still a learner and i dont claim to be an hot shot) as i was among top contributors in sap mm forum apart from that i have cleared the interviews for sap mm in atl east 10 companys in a row and those are sap global and implementation partener like IBM etc.

then why is that we give so much of an importance to acads and not to the potential of a guy

is it really fair to punish someone who did mistakes in child hood !!!!!

[Former Member]

although i am closing this but i am still open for the opinion of pepole here.

[Former Member]

Hi,

as you said, you are still a learner (by the way we all are learners) and so may be fresh in the business (market) and so a criteria is needed to judge your knowledge. In the first step this is how you did in school, in university... as there is nothing else to look at. If you have some years of experience your project profile will become more and more important and so what you called your potential.

As always: It is hard to come in

regards

Siggi

[Former Member]

i strongly agree with your opinion that we have only acads to judge a candidate but it should not be the sole critera

to judge

are you saying that if i have, suppose ten years of experience then sap labs is not going to bother about the acads.

[Former Member]

Hi,

well I believe they are still looking at it, but the experience is more weighted then.

Siggi

[Former Member]

if academics can why not points from SCN