[BUG] Safe words filter applied to URL

[former_member197733]

I was trying to preview a blog post when I got this error:

https://i.imgur.com/S8OnjOt.png

I did not know we had a "safe words" filter.

But the issue here is that I was not using it in my post.

The Reason for the problem is this:

https://i.imgur.com/JGb4mFt.png

An image with random a generated name that is referenced. I imagine this can also impact links

[craigcmehil]

Yes the image name contains a flagged SPAM word. An overly often used SPAM word.

[former_member197733]

That was clear.

But still a bug, since it isn't even a word, it's a url.

Can we have this fixed or have an option to not flag it as spam?

(Reasons why it would even check that for a blog post by an employee is beyond my comprehension)

[thiago]

Preventing people from publishing blog posts just by checking flagged spam words, or abbreviations, without any context validation doesn't help, at all. It would be fine to get warnings or even have the post submitted to the moderators analysis - but blocking it completely doesn't seem right, specially when it comes to a clear bug like the one mentioned here.

[Former Member]

For now, we're keeping this word to be filtered because of the impact we see from it. However, we will take your question as feedback to consider for the future.

The spam settings check the content of all SAP Community members without discerning between SAP employees and other members.

[thiago]

Here's another issue on the same topic, but I'm sure you're already addressing it.

I'm not publishing, I'm just trying to save (as draft). Even though I replaced the word "deal" in the Title, it blocks me from saving (permalink is not updated):

[Former Member]

I am going to loop you both in an email chain so our team can capture your feedback for our IT team.
Best,
Your SAP Community moderator

[former_member197733]

Hi mariahblake. I am not asking for the word to be removed from the filter

I am asking for the bug on the filter, to be fixed.

It should not consider a URL part of a word. In my case, I could generate a new URL. But imagine in the another, where I want to reference a website, for example, that happens to have one of the forbidden combination of characters in the URL.

It is a technical matter, not a policy one.

Thank you.

[Former Member]

Hello,

To follow up the process to filter spam will be continuous. Our internal teams will adjust it as needed.