on ‎2010 Mar 29 8:15 PM
Hi experts,
I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82, when I try to assign a team in the tab "EventLocation", the transaction sends me the message "Equipment not available at the functional location".
I previously reviewed the equipment is assigned to the transaction IL03.
No authorization errors, I checked with the transaction SU53.
Any idea to solve this problem?
I appreciate it.
Request clarification before answering.
Hello Uldarico
I understand, you are facing difficulty while assigning equipment under "Damage" part of the CBIH82. Check the validity of the equipment.
Thanks
Jayakumar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
Please check IE03 entry for the same equipment number whether you find corresponding FL or not?
During master data upload if entries are passed directly in back end, there are chances of incorrect assignment of equipments and functional location, else equipment has to be available as INST at functional location.
Regards,
Pavan
Hi Pavan,
I check IE03 and the number of equipment, it is assigned to the FL in the Structure tab, the status of the equipment is INST.
Also check FL with the transaction IL03, are correct.
In transacction CBIH82, when I press F4 at the entrance of number of equipment shows me the equipment assigned to FL, and i choose one and followed then sends the message "Equipment not available at the functional location".
I do not understand what happens, if the equipments are assigned correctly.
Best Regards ...
Uldárico.
Hello,
I happened to again see this post where question is yet to be answered.
As per SAP standard design, only those equipment would be allowed which are directly installed on the functional location. What this means is that those equipment which are not directly assigned to the functional location (might be assigned to another superior equipment which in turn is assigned to the functional location) can't be saved.
Now, I am not sure why SAP has kept it like this when the same is allowed in notification.
Can somebody clarify the business relevance of this standard behavior??
Regards,
Pavan
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.