cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

display hazards symbols in wwi template EHS based on pharases

0 Kudos
417

HI Experts.

I am very new to EHS. I need to display the Corrision symbol if hazard statement is

1> 290 and 318

2>alone318

3> should not display if alone 290.

I wrote the below code but its not working, its showing Corrision symbol in all the above cases.

<01GESTRSUBID(M:ZISI003_SYM_STACK_NEW)>

<11BRG028(M,SAP_EHS_1023_094;*)>

<13BNG032(*:01G1023094HS(K))>

<11BRG023(D;*)>

<15BIF001(OR:01G1023094HS(K;*) LK "CUST-N15.00930140")>

<01GESTRSUBID(M:ZISI003_SYM_STACK_PUSH)>

<15EIF001>

<11ERG023>

<13ENG032>

<11ERG028>

<13BNG159(*:01GESTRSUBID(M:ZISI003_SYM_STACK_TOP))>

<03EHS_L_GRAP(CUST-N15.00931405)>

<13ENG159>

Please suggest on this

Sujatha sahu

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

christoph_bergemann
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello

the "stack" approach might not be useful if you have characteristics which allows "multiple values" (and this is possible for your characteristic

There is no "defined sequence" in maintenance and therefore i have doubts if the "stack" option can work. you can have situations like this;

Position 1 wished phrase

Position 2 unwished phrase

Position 3 wished phrase

etc.

or like

Position 1 unwished phrase

Position 2 wished phrase

etc.

So you need a kind of "loop" and i am not sure if this is possible with the "stack" option

C.B:

christoph_bergemann
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Please check on top the existing WWI blogs (e.g. WWI for experts). The "Stack" topic and the "IF" story is discussed often. As Satya has listed: In your case we can not support as you do not use SAP original report symbols. Your "high level wish/Demand" is not easy to support (Huge list of topics to list; i skip this)

C.B.

satya11719
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello sujathakumarisahu.telukala

Function module ZISI003_SYM_STACK_NEW is customized; please check the code in that first and there are certain standard FM, which you can acheive the same results. Please check the below link.

https://blogs.sap.com/2013/08/30/standard-wwi-processing-methods-wwi/

I hope this helps.

Regards

Satya