on 2022 Jul 18 1:57 PM
Good morning,
I have around 600 existing work orders where WBS should have been defined with IW31 (in Settlement Rule and/or Additional Data and/or Location). I'm looking for a way to mass control that all of those work orders have compliant WBS and not forgotten where they should be.
So I tried with IW38 and a lay out where we can only use columns as "WBS ord. header" and "WBS element". But it is not efficient, as it gives sometimes wrong WBS (meaning unexpected) in "WBS element" column while the WBS is the good one when I control directly in Additional Data.
Do you know another way to control with IW38 or other transaction?
Thanks by advance
Aurélien
Request clarification before answering.
User | Count |
---|---|
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.