on 2019 Sep 18 11:13 AM
Hi,
The best process for below situation:-
In our organisation, we are in the process of roll out SF and HCM and both projects are run separately.
So not necessary countries who are using SF will have HCM okay.
Scenario is -
Mr X is a manager for legal entity A where there is no HCM only SF is used, but people reports to him are working in legal entity B
where we got SF and HCM both the system in place.
Now the issue is Mr X position and his profile cannot to process in HCM legal entity A is not configured as they are not using the system, but due to this, all legal entity B employees are stuck in error, because manager position is missing.
Any best process for the above scenario, which can support both SF and HCM system ?
Regards,
Renuka
Request clarification before answering.
Best advice is to build the entire org structure with positions into EC. The Manager from Legal Entity A should then be hired into EC for the reporting line, the rest of the Legal A employees do not have to be migrated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Also , you can consider side by side if data changes you would need to update SF also
https://help.sap.com/viewer/602c38f7400b4d2693602a178c2bf028/2011/en-US
or just make a Employee profile record ie stub record for the employees not yet live in SF EC so that they can do above activities
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Siddharth,
We are also facing similar issue with our BIB Integration from SF to S/4 HANA. In SF- EC we have few employees whose Managers belongs to different countries that are not in scope for S/4.So for those employees we are getting error that Manager position does not exist.
So i have came across below solution in the link for this issue which suggests to implement a BAdI so that we can ignore those Manager positions and replication errors will be resolved.
But can you please suggest if implementation of this BAdI will impact other modules as these Employees will not have Reporting to relationships which might require for workflow process for other modules like FICO, MM
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 7 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.