on 2023 May 25 9:51 AM
The line manager was promoted, and after her promotion was created, a record was added on her subordinates as promotion effective 1 May 2023. The subordinate's promotion record shows only a manager change, no other job info was changed on that record. The subordinate record has even been replicated in ERP.
The subordinate record shows there was a promotion but the promotion only took place for the Line manger.
What could have caused this promotion record to end up on this employee?
Looking forward to your help.
TIA
Request clarification before answering.
The system needs a standard event reason / uses event derivation to determine what the change was. My guess the standard event reason must have been promotion then (so it may be advisable to verify that).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I understand however, the issue is that the promotion should not have happened to the employee in the first place. The only person who was promoted was the Line Manager. A manager change record is the only record that the employee (subordinate) should have not a promotion record. And on the employee promotion record the only action that took place was a manager change.
User | Count |
---|---|
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.