cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

External candidate Registration Without E-Mail Verification in EHP5

Former Member
0 Kudos
231

Hi Experts,

     When an External candidate registers using ' hrrcf_a_candidate_registration ' his USER ID is created and stored R/3 .

     when external candidate maintain his profile in  "MY PROFILE" maintenance.

     when he press "next step" during profile maintenance process system throws an error saying "The COMMIT WORK processing must not be interrupted".

Regards

Sanjay

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Sally

thanks for replying.

The notes which you have mentioned are deployed by standard because we are using highest level support.

The below details gives the software component which i am using :-

soft component :- SAP_ABA

release :- 702

level :- 0010

highest support :- SAPKA70210

In ST22 the error details says;-

    During the COMMIT WORK statement, the following are executed:

    - the routines registered with the statement PERFORM .. ON COMMIT,

    - the registered methods for the events of the object services

      and

    - possibly the local update (SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL).

    An exception was raised and caught. The normal sequence of the routines

    was interrupted by this resulting in the program being continued before

    the call of COMMIT WORK. As this can lead to inconsistencies, the

    processing cannot be continued in the normal way.

regards

sanjay

NicoleGeischnek
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Hello Sanjay,

Is the dump created because of the ERC_OBJECT CREATED workflow? Could you please check that?

Regards

Nicole

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sanjay,

Can you please check the OSS# 1690866. Hope it will solve your issue.

Regards,

Venkat Duggirala

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

0 Kudos

Hi Sanjay

It is not a very common error but you might want to take a look at the full dump in ST22 as I have seen other customers resolve it by checking the table space in case there is some hardware limitation happening here?

I did also see a similar issue resolved with notes

1232846 and 1229811 also

thanks

Sally