on ‎2012 Jul 19 12:54 PM
Hi gurus
I have noticed that when an employee leaves the company (terminate action) there are 2 problems:
I discovered that employment status "0-Withdrawn" was excluded in the distribution model (BD64) on the HR side, so I changed that and now the employee is indeed sent, but on EREC it still makes no difference.
Another thing which seems "weird" to me is that terminated employees all get position "99999999" in HR with end date 31.12.9999. This "assignment" is also included in the idoc to EREC.
We use EREC as stand-alone and are on ERECRUIT 604 0010. Note 1643666 is already implemented.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
Regards
Aage Kold Jensen
Request clarification before answering.
Hello Aage,
This was corrected in the last months. Please implement notes 1618643 and 1716811 (for the positions 1601361 and 1620244).
Best regards
Nicole
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Nicole
Thank you very much for your prompt respone. I have done a little research:
1618643 - Not relevant, our scenario is I2
1601361 - Not relevant because of SP level
1620244 - Not relevant, no employees with multiple positions
1716811 - I am unsure about this one. HR employees access the BSP pages and I believe recruiting through the portal also calls those pages. But both internal and external candidates apply through WebDynpro and have a user and password on the backend. Looking in note 1017866 I find it difficult to determine our constellation and therefor if 1716811 is relevant for us. My guess is we use constellation "1".
Best regards
Aage
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.