cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SOD conflicts in ACTVT level

EvgeniyKlyukin
Discoverer
0 Kudos
248

Hello.

We testing new SODs and CA rulesets

In report the "false/positive" risk that ARA is showing is when we run the report to permission and action level.

Example:

User 1 have CA:

S_TCODE - TCD - OB52 - role 1 AND

S_TCODE - TCD - OB52 - role 2 AND

S_TABU_NAM - ACTVT - 02 - role 2 AND

S_TABU_NAM - TABLE - V_T0001B role 3 OR

S_TABU_NAM - TABLE - V_T0001B_COFI - role 3

But reality is that for S_TABU_NAM - TABLE values user has only 03 action.

As you see role 2 and 3 in conflict. It role 2 (with 02 action) there's no access to table V_T0001B, user can't change it.

And as a reasult we have false/positive" risk

How it can be changed? maybe some different mapping is needed

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (0)