on ‎2021 Jun 01 9:41 PM
My question is regarding wanting to display the values in the AO report according to the absolute (or DB) signage rather than the 'natural' signage that EPM uses based on the account type. Even when using AO, the liabilities that have a credit bal are displayed as positive and debit amounts are shown as negative. This seems to be due to the signage being set up on the account hierarchy automatically when it is created, based on the account type of the values/nodes in the hierarchy. Is there any way to prevent the Reverse Signage flag from being set on the hierarchy members? Does the CREDITPOSITIVE value in the transformation file control this?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Sri
Request clarification before answering.
1 - is it possible without needing to use epmretrieve() ? Meaning, can users without in-depth knowledge of EPM be able to do handle that?
Sorry, but not clear!
If you have proper dimensions with proper number of required hierarchies then everything is simple.
2 is there any code snippet you can point me to?
Sample:
Standard YTD measure for YTD model is:
'IIF(([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC" OR [%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ"),-([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])), ([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])))' SOLVE_ORDER=3Create VERY simple custom YTD measure: CYTD
'([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%]))' SOLVE_ORDER=3You can see - no sign change happens!
Same for other measures.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Vadim - that helps! With regard to the slice and dice reporting on attributes - an example is a Product type Dimension which has an attribute of Bank vs Nonbank .. with Analysis I can simply pull the Attribute into the report and display the balances according to Bank vs Nonbank split; with EPM it doesnt seem to be possible via drag and drop.
Also, is it required to have at least one hierarchy per dimension, so that all values can be selected in the report definition ? (Top node and member/descendants combination) - since EPM context seems to require a selection for each and every dimension.
srikanth.ramachandran
An example of dimensions that has no hierarchy by default:
CATEGORY
CURRENCY
For the rest it's better to have at least one.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 30 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.