on 2019 Apr 09 11:26 AM
Hi Experts.
We are implementing RTC 1709 for Consolidation, using integration rule to bring ACDOCA data to ACDOCC. Required data not available in ACDOCA, hence we loaded data using RTCFU Tcode like flat file upload or input template in standard BPC.
I have run Intercompany booking and found very funny results,They are:
1. If two accounts representing Receivable and Payable are grouped in one node(hierarchy), and used in the rule: both GL Account values are posted in both the company codes.
Expectation: As we are using sellers rule, it should be booked in buyer company for the net difference. Result is attached.
2. Balance with non trading member has two records, I could see one of the non trading partner balance is posted in line with scenario 1 discussed above. One non trading balance is not posted.
3. In the Advanced settings of model I have set 100/NONE default trading partner. Screen shot attached.
Audit trail dimension enclosed in excel format. Screen shot attached.
ID ERP/DSTYPE ERP/ICORGI ERP/ISCONS INPUT I I Y ICMM_B9 ICMM_B10 CREDIT1 C1 CREDIT2 C2 DEBIT1 D1 DEBIT2 D2
Input is data source to capture data, ICMM_B9 and ICMM_B10 are for booking IC Booking values for two sets of GL nodes.
Attachment List:
IC Booking Results
Default Trading Partner
Consolidation Monitor and Business rules
Audit Trail dimension setup
GL Grouping
Regards,
Shanmukha Rao.
trading-partner.pngconsolidation-monitor-and-business-rule.pngaudittrail-dimension.pnggl-hierarchy.png
Request clarification before answering.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.