Incompleteness Check- OSS Note 1945148

[Former Member]

Hello

As part of AES OSS Notes implementation, we have implemented OSS Note 1945148, which is in completed status. All the prerequisite Notes and Correction Instructions are also implemented completely.

Part of the Note details says "In addition, the 2 new fields "License Value" and "Ultimate Consignee" have been added to the Incompleteness Check.

I checked under Field Definition in "Control Incompleteness Checks for General Documents in Customs Management" in IMG and did not see these 2 new fields. The system is prompting me to create new entries but as "Z"/Custom.

So my question is are we supposed to create Z fields for License Value and Ultimate Consignee or am I missing something here.

Also should these 2 fields UCTYP and PAPVL appear under field definitions automatically or no?

Why would the Note say 2 new fields are added to the Incompleteness Check?

Thanks

Best Regards

Sam

[Former Member]

Hi Dave

Thank you so much for your response, but if I leave the Ultimate Consignee Type field on my Export shipment blank, should the incompletion procedure not stop me and say that the field is blank and needs to be completed before triggering the message to the Customs.

My understanding is when the Note added 2 new fields to the Incompleteness Check, it will add these 2 new fields to the Field definition and allow me to use those 2 new fields in my incompletion procedures and the incompletion procedure will check if these 2 fields are filled/completed before I submit the shipment to Customs, but looks like this is not the purpose this note serves.

Thanks

Sam

[former_member215181]

Hi Sam,

I guess that if the Ult.Consignee is required, then the incompletion procedure will tell you so.  Somehow I think it's optional in the message.

The new checks are hard-coded in a Function Module.  You could assign the module - but not the individual field checks - to any other Incompletion Procedure, and so use for your own Message Type.

Have fun!

Dave

[former_member215181]

Hi Sam,

You don't need to create any new fields.  The correction Note does two things for the incompletion procedure:

1. If there's a Licence with value, it checks that the value is not too large for the field length, and also that the value is expressed in USD.
   
   
2. If there's an Ultimate Consignee partner, it checks that the type is D, G, O or R (Consumer, Government Entity, Other or Reseller).  Those GTS values map to message values XT, QW, B2, and DU respectively.
   
   

Hope that helps.

Regards,

Dave

[Former Member]

Hi Dave

Can you explain where / how values need to maintain, as we are getting error at message incompletion "Ult. Consignee Type must have a value other than O"

Point 2: " If there's an Ultimate Consignee partner, it checks that the type is D, G, O or R. Those GTS values map to message values XT, QW, B2 and DU.

Though it is old post but not able to find any other related solution..

Regards- AK