on 2019 Oct 10 7:35 PM
Hello Friends,
Currently in my company we are using the funds transfer documents (FMWA), however, we are having trouble using the creditor field, this field was already enabling in the Status field so that it can be used optionally, yet the field is disabled as if you will find the status visible field.
Has anyone had this problem?
I would appreciate your comments,
Thanks and regards.
Victor
Request clarification before answering.
Hi,
I believe, for fund transfer earmarked funds, vendor field is disabled. Only for budgetary commitments, e.g. reservation, this field is active.
Regards,
Eli
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Eli,
If, I begin to think the same, because the status group field of a "found transfer" is shared with the "Funds commitment", I suppose that being a more operational document, if the creditor is useful, however I am trying to exhaust the possibility of a misinterpretation on my part.
Thanks for you comments,
Regards,
Victor
No, it deosn't seem to be a misunderstanding. I checked the code, and the field is deliberately de-activated. Which, again, makes sense to me from functional perspective... As fund transfers, is in no way, a predecessor for logistic document, while other EMFs are.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.