on ‎2020 Jul 20 9:11 AM
Hi,
This question has been asked earlier but there was no answer to it. We have a scenario where we have CRM system in frontend and then the backend system is ISU ( IS - Utilities ) .
How do we create the risk in GRC 10.1 system where we don't know how to determine the WEB UI components which could be based on UIU_COMP auth object which has values for each screen.
Is there a way to create a risk for a process that starts in CRM and ends in ISU.
Thanks ,
Ritesh Soni
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Ritesh
Two options (and both would need prototyping to check validity
1. See if possible to configure CRM and ISU like a Hub scenario for Fiori (set the ISU connective as a subsequent connector to CRM). I'm not confident on this as it may be a Fiori use case only
2. Define the conflicting functions differently as a cross-system risk based on single function in CRM and ISU
For option 2....
Risk = Function A + Function B
CRM/ISSUE situations seems to be
FUNCTION A = Action A in CRM and Permissions A in ISU
FUNCTION B = Action B in CRM and Permission B in ISU
Risk = Action A in CRM + Action B in CRM + Permission A in ISU + Permission B in ISU
Therefore, when defining the SOD Conflict try doing a cross-system risk with
Function A = Action A + Action B in CRM
Function B = Permission A + Permissions B in ISU
Regards
Colleen
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Thanks for the information. Can we do this for a critical action ?
Critical action will only span across 1 system.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
A risk set as critical action means it is a single function risk definition
In the case of a "critical action" in your use case, you would be defining it as a cross-system SOD Risk. You would have a two functions - 1 in ISU and 1 in CRM to form together for the risk
This approach, assuming it works for you, would need to recognise a different in language - the risk definition versus the technical definition
You Critical Action and your segregation of duties would all be configured as cross-system SoD Risks. You might want to use naming conventions to differentiate which is a Critical Action (and will mean inherent conflict in a role or user) versus SoD.
Regards
Colleen
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 32 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.