on ‎2019 Oct 04 9:20 AM
I have to avoid PO Box fields and communication fields to be screened while doing spl screening
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Amit ,
If you remove the PO box and email address from this customization ,system won't do screening for those fields or you can remove check object flag from below config .As others already mentioned above it won't screen if you remove the fields or remove the check object flag .
Check and let us know .Still exists share the configuration screenshot
Global Trade services -> Compliance management -> Sanctioned Party List Screening
-> Define Comparison Procedure -> Define Comparison Procedure for Address Comparison ->Detail control
Regards
Lijo Silvoster
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If also depends if you want to include Address in your screening comparison. There are many reasons to screen Name/Country only (bypass address altogether). Name/Country only screening is typically recommended as best practice by MK/Descartes. If you want to screen address, then you need to manipulate the fields within the address. But if you screen Name/Country only, then you won't need to worry about PO Box. There's no "right" solution because GTS screens fields against fields rather than stringing all the fields together (which is how MK/Descartes, OCR, Visual Compliance, Amber Road, etc. work). Therefore your Compliance team needs to understand the pros/cons of each scenario and what works best for their business.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Amit,
Go to SPRO setting
Global Trade services -> Compliance management -> Sanctioned Party List Screening
-> Define Comparison Procedure -> Define Comparison Procedure for Address Comparison
In this SPRO configuration,
First select SPL Comparison Procedure for which you want this change, then click on ASSIGNMENT OF ADDRESS FIELD -> Remove P.O. BOX field to avoid SPL check for this field.
Please let me know if this fulfill your requirement.
Thanks,
Nitin
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 17 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.