on ‎2019 Sep 08 1:26 PM
Hi
We have a parent GL PMTR_B00001 which has base elements as TB_B0001 + TB_B0002. TB_B0001 has a calculated value which is summation of 2 GLs being done via a member formula.
When I check the value at PMTR_B00001 it just shows me data at TB_B0002, value of TB_B0001 is not getting aggregated. I have read on a forum that calculated members don't get aggregated at Parent GL so what can be an alternative to this ? I cannot handle it in script because that would require executing a package etc. Is there any other way that this case can be handled ?
Regards
Request clarification before answering.
Parent will never aggregate calculated members!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
"I have read on a forum that calculated members don't get aggregated at Parent GL so what can be an alternative to this ?" - Correct!
You can create another calculated member with member formula:
TB_B0002+TB_B000x+TB_B000y
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 41 | |
| 9 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.