cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Fund & does not exist in FM area & - FI 759

sam_m6
Explorer
0 Likes
4,830

Hello Eli & All,

Need guidance on the following error.

Getting "Fund does not exist in FM area: Message FI 759". We were able to post a initial budget and AP invoice through FB60 corresponding to the budget created. No issues until yesterday. Yesterday we tried to post a invoice through FB60, entered "Fund" and got derived all the FM objects for GL line, when trying to save the document we got the message that Fund does not exist and found that Fund is expected to enter for "Vendor" line item.

We have the field status optional for the said Vendor Reconciliation account. Not sure where the message is coming from.

Thanks in advance.

Sam.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Likes

Hi,

What type of commitment item do you assign/derive for your vendor line? Normally, it should be that of '60' financial transaction. Unless, you have some very specific requirements for budget management. However, if it's defined correctly, then fund wouldn't be a required field for an entry.

Regards,

Eli

sam_m6
Explorer
0 Likes

Hello Eli,

Thanks for your response, it was "50" assigned earlier and I have changed it to "60" now. But still have the same error.

Sam.

Note: I was able to post couple of days before with no change to Financial Transaction.

sam_m6
Explorer
0 Likes

Eli/Ankur,

I created a new rule to assign Budget Period to default it. That caused the issue, I removed the derivation and no issues.

Thanks your help Eli/Ankur.

Sam.

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Likes

Hi,

If it was linked to budget period, it's a bug. You don't have to remove the rule, but implement the following OSS note:

1764558 - Fund is not checked when changed, if budget period is filled

Regards,

Eli

ankurch
Active Contributor
0 Likes

Goto transaction FMDERIVER activate the trace and repeat the transaction, system trace will tell you where you doing wrong!!

sam_m6
Explorer

Thanks Ankur,

I checked the derivation for vendor recon, don't see any issues.

Sam.