cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

FM- Purchase req. Value type 50 not reduced subsequently after Purchase order creation

0 Kudos
845

Dear team,

We are using ECC 617 0010.

We are facing a issue in Budget consumption report. After analysis we found that, the value type 50 (Purchase requisition) amount was not reduced with amount type 200 after the creation of subsequent purchase order. Because of which, system consuming double the budget and not releasing consumption amount from Purchase requisition.

Please advice.

Many Thanks

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

If it is SES, as I suspected, there could be different reasons for this discrepancy. It is complicated to find the reason without looking into the system. Raise OSS ticket, unless you can debug the system by yourself.

Regards,

Eli

shareeq_hussain
Active Participant
0 Kudos

In the case of Service PR , The difference between the PR and PO will be in the Rem Ord Plan(blocking the Budget) , if the PR value is Higher.

Kindly TECO the Service Activity in which the PR is created. This works in Project Systems

Alternatively you can modify the PR value to same as the PO Value.

Unfortunately it does not take the PO value as commitment and Ignore the PR value in case of Service PR's

Regards,

Shareeq

0 Kudos

Yes, this bug was only with SES PR's.

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

It could be a bug or a temporary glitch. What kind of PR is it? Is it SES?

Did you try to run FMN3N?

Regards,

Eli

0 Kudos

Its temporary glitch for few PR's and PO's. We performed T.code FMN3N and there after FMAVCREINIT, but system reduced the PR value with Amount "0" instead of actual PR line amount in Table FMIOI.

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

If FMN3N didn't make the right deduction, then it's a bug. FMAVCREINIT wouldn't fix this, as it works only for AVC ledger tables. Are these SES PRs?