on 2024 Jul 05 8:53 AM
Dear Experts,
Here I enclosed the fixed asset useful life change process scenarios. We get wrong depreciation calculations.
Kindly go throw it and give a correct solution for it. We need to answer our client.
Expected valuable replies ASAP.
Thanks in advance.
Scenario 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Code: TESTASSET9-000001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Name: TESTASSET9-01/120m | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful life: 120 months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation Type: STRAIGHT LINE (Acquisition value/Total Useful life) and enabled Round Off. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization Date: 01.04.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation Start Date: 01.04.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization value: 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
First depreciation run on 31.03.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As per now we have the NBV is: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1000/120) = 8.33 => 8 (Round off)(Depreciation/month) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8*12 = 96 (Depreciation per year) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New NBV => 1000-96 = 904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset History Sheet report | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Account | Account Name | Asset Class | Asset No. | Asset Description | Historical APC | Capitalization Date | Useful Life | Remaining Life | Depr. Type | APC on Start Date | Accum. Depr. on Start Date | Accum. Write-Up on Start Date | NBV on Start Date | Capitalization | Retired APC | Retired NBV | Transferred APC | Transferred NBV | Write-Up | Depreciation | APC on End Date | NBV on End Date | Depr. on End Date | Accum. Depr. on End Date |
1010101002 | Asset - Buildings | TESTASSET9-000001 | TESTASSET9-01/120m | 0 | 01-04-2023 | 120 | 96 | STRAIGHTLINE | 1,000.00 | 96 | 0 | 904 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,000.00 | 904 | 96 | 96 | |
Now we are changing useful life from 120months to 732months on FY2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As per our calculation the NBV is: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1000/732) = 1.36 => 1 (Round off)(Depreciation/month) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1*12 = 12 (Depreciation per year) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New NBV => 1000-12 = 988 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset History Sheet report | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Account | Account Name | Asset Class | Asset No. | Asset Description | Historical APC | Capitalization Date | Useful Life | Remaining Life | Depr. Type | APC on Start Date | Accum. Depr. on Start Date | Accum. Write-Up on Start Date | NBV on Start Date | Capitalization | Retired APC | Retired NBV | Transferred APC | Transferred NBV | Write-Up | Depreciation | APC on End Date | NBV on End Date | Depr. on End Date | Accum. Depr. on End Date |
Wrong Depreciation (actually we got) | TESTASSET9-000001 | TESTASSET9-01/120m | 0 | 01-04-2023 | 732 | 708 | STRAIGHTLINE | 1,000.00 | -24 | 0 | 1,024.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,000.00 | 1,024.00 | -24 | -24 | ||
Actual Depreciation (Expected) | TESTASSET9-000002 | TESTASSET9-02/732m | 0 | 01-04-2023 | 732 | 708 | STRAIGHTLINE | 1,000.00 | 12 | 0 | 988 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,000.00 | 988 | 12 | 12 |
Request clarification before answering.
Hi,
Have you checked the similar scenario on the DEMO database.
When the useful life is changes, the planned depreciation is recalculated. Hence, whatever the depreciation was posted in previous year with 120 useful life is adjusted based on the calculation which is now based on the new useful life of 732 months.
If you run the Depreciation Run again for the previous year(last period), you will find that the system now tries to be post a negative depreciation for that year to adjust the extra depreciation posted.
Check in DEMO.
Also, you can check the following if it helps in some way to clarify things:
Kr,
Jitin
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
6 | |
4 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.