on 2016 Feb 05 5:48 PM
Hi Experts,
I face issue using Elimination Rules in a Consolidation Model.
In some cases, (most of), datas are multiply at each consolidation ; it seems that the problem occurs when the account destination of the rule is different than the source account.
Détails below :
Before Conso :
After 1st Conso : Résults are correct. :
After 2nd Conso : Data on elimination audittrail are multiply, and so on at each consolidation :
Anybody has met that kind of issue ?
Tks for your help.
Best regards,
Olivia.
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Olivia,
have you tried to define the destination accounts by ID in the rule and if so, does that make any difference?
also, what does your multiplier M_IC look like?
BR,
Arnold
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Arnold,
have you tried to define the destination accounts by ID in the rule and if so, does that make any difference?
Yes. No difference. Data are also doubled at each run of Consolidation.
Also note, that Amount are not doubled when destination account remains the same as source account.
also, what does your multiplier M_IC look like?
Note that i've tried with MINORITY Formula filled as "1" ou without anything.
Results are the same.
Tks a lot,
Olivia.
Hi Olivia,
have a look at SAP NOTE 1514944 - it is about the IS_CONSOL property in the AUDIT dimension. Alternatively, SAP NOTE 1682227 might help, it is about the STORE_GROUP_CURR property in your GROUP dimension.
BR,
Arnold
Arnold Warhonowicz wrote:
Hi Olivia,
have a look at SAP NOTE 1514944 - it is about the IS_CONSOL property in the AUDIT dimension.
Regarding that, my destination datasource used in business are already flagged as :
IS_CONSOL = Y
IS_CONVERT=Y
Alternatively, SAP NOTE 1682227 might help, it is about the STORE_GROUP_CURR property in your GROUP dimension.
BR,
Arnold
My consolidated scope is flagged as STORE_GROUP_CURRENCY=Y
I've got a conversion rule using AS_IS formula.
I do not use the integration mode in my BR formula.
So not sure i'm concerned with that note
But thanks for your help,
Olivia.
Hi Arnold,
SAP has said in note:1941497
So flow dimension should have opening and closing flow type.
I keep the delivered the flow member as it is and use to create a new flow member based on requirement
Regards,
Rahul
Hi Olivia,
It might be due to some parameters are missing in your dimension.Please check the below note:
1941497 - Check points for consolidation issue
Regards,
Rahul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 15 | |
| 11 | |
| 10 | |
| 4 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.