A down payment was posted for a forward order and partial quantities were calculated. An item (item 30) of the forward order was then canceled. Since the down payment is posted with the full value to the last order item, the reversal of the order item and the reversal of the posted down payment result in a data inconsistency in the area of down payments/taxes. From our point of view, the inconsistency results from the tax calculation based on the net value of the delivery - which in our view is not correct in this case - and not from the net value of the delivery reduced by the new down payment. We are looking for a way to avoid this inconsistency by default (i.e. to calculate the tax in such cases differently from the standard).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.