on ‎2015 Sep 09 6:07 PM
Hi Experts
I am currently using Account Based Calculation Business rule to calculate retained earning
I have created a business rule to totally allocate net income for the year to retained earning but there is something very strange
retained earning over all months were calculated correctly except Dec of every year
Request clarification before answering.
the only difference is that on 12-2013 data purely coming from ecc
but on 12-2014 data was coming from ecc and i did some reclassification for some costs in the P/L statement on the audit trail member ( local adjustment )
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
i just changed it to confirm that its working with the business rule
just to test it
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
the one that have parent is what i use
vadim i run a business rule for the local adj member only and it transformed the amount correctly
so it seems that the amount of the ECC Input Member overwrite the balances of member Local Adj
so how can configure the business rule with sum mode not overwrite mode
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
i mean that i have configured the business rule which include the audit trail (local ADJ) as in the below pic
the problem is that audit trail member not effected by the business rule (out of the scope as u told me )
what i need to do now is to know why this specific member is out of scope
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi vadim
i have checked it and the member audit trail (local adj) is not reflected using the business rule
but i have configured it in the business rule so i dont know what exactly the problem
why its net reflected using the business rule
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Vadim i tried the business rule on Dec 2013 and its working fine
this mean that the problem is with Dec 2014 only
may cause there was some manual input reclassification ?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
And where can I see all required setup screenshots?
Vadim
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 17 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.