on 2012 Jun 25 9:31 AM
Dear all,
Understand that there are many other discussion about the msg "Work item 000000000000 cannot be read" but none of them relate to EhP5 upgrade so I create a new one here.
My problem is after I upgrade ECC to EhP5 and try to approve or reject leave.
(Our EP is still on 7.00 SP25 and ESS on Java WD 600 SP19 with some customization, OSS replied that they will still support this ESS version)
The message "Work item 000000000000 cannot be read" show and unable to approve or reject the leave, and if we press the buttion again the message "Approve/reject most current version of leave request" show
Regards
Bill
so you are not activated EHP5 switches, so you can use this then.
Anyhow for above error, you get for all approvals?
1665826 please apply this note and also it can be due to
the problem could be caused by a missing Customizing Activity.
Please go to transaction SWU3.
As you can see, the most important activity (Configure RFC Destination)
is not performed (Or not performed correctly).
If in customizing the Activity is not set as performed,
errors such the one you are facing could occur.
Please go to SWU3 and perform again the the activity Configure RFC
Destination. The activity has to be set as Checked (Green flag)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Siddharth,
Thanks for the prompt reply, checked SWU3 and find that the "Configure RFC Destination" step have problem, after we complete that and "Maintain Prefix Numbers", we start the apply and reject test all over again, and it can be completed now thanks a lot.
Some schedule jobs step still have problem, but I think they should be able to resolve by our basis admin.
I would like to ask some 2 more questions.
1) At the "Check Entries from HR Control Tables" step, I have error in PDST and PDWS, I can use report RHSOBJCH to fix it, but:
- What's really is that missing entry do?
- And am I doing the right things to use RHSOBJCH to fix them?
- It seem that it is new entry needed after upgrade, did I need to run RHSOBJCH for each environment separately?
2) For notes 1665826, it seem not related to our problem, you suggest apply that because you know we will hit that if we test further?
Regards
Bill
User | Count |
---|---|
106 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.