on 2022 May 17 7:38 AM
Hi All,
Please help for the below issue:
Wagetype 6415 is not working as expected.
With Payment model 0053, this WT6415 should deduct in the applicable period If there are hours worked in any of the periods with in the month.
Worked 8 hours in PP01 (Payperiod) therefore should be union deduction taken in PP05
Worked 8 hours in PP19 (Payperiod) therefore should be union deduction taken in PP22.
No Deductions are taken at all and instead entire amount YTD is being refunded.
Below highlighted WT6415 Union dues flat CPQMC should get deducted. Worked 8 hours in PP19 (Payperiod) therefore should be union deduction taken in PP22.
Thank you
Request clarification before answering.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
Could you please help on the above issue.
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
Can you please help us on the below issue.
I have maintained the hours for the 19th Payperiod and run the live payroll. Also i ran 20, 21 and 22nd payroll when i do simulation the monthly cumulation value is not getting. So the payment model for PP22nd its not getting deducted.
PP 22nd
22nd payroll simulation WT6415 is not getting deducted
I could see the M monthly cummulator for the PP21
PP22nd
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Can you add one more line of Code as following ?
NUM= CM4003 ---> To check monthly hours except current period
NUM+ 4003 ----> To check current period hours
NUM?0
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
Thank you for the response.
I have added the above mentioned, but still WT6415 PP05 its not getting deducted.
I am running the payroll from 1st PP to 9 Pay Period (Live Run). 5th PP there is no deduction that is working fine, because from 1st PP to 8th Pay Period there is no Working hours maintained so that scenario is correct and working as expected.
Keyin the working hours for 9th Pay period and WT4003 have working hours of 40 hours but there is no deduction happen but 9th period is the standard deduction period.
Input Parameter:
WT4003 have 40 hrs working hours
can you please send a test mail to lakshmanmsit@gmail.com
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Decision on NUM=CM4003 is not accurate for your scenario. Because , 0 hours also will pass through the above rule.
The rule should be as follows,
NUM=CM4003
NUM?0
*
> ADDWT *
The WT4003 CRT entry which you highlighted has cumulation parameter Y in the last column.
So make sure the parameter M is configured for WT4003 in table T54C3, if not , this solution will not work.
Can you share the screenshots for CRT table view of WT9903 at the end of PP05 and the updated rule ZCC9 ?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Lakshman,
First, you have a payment/deduction model, and it's set up as expected. Then,maintain the deduction model in IT0014 and let the system take care of deductions at required intervals.
Secondly, If EE is working, WT9903 will be generated.Then,depending on the WT 9903 configuration in T54C3, the wage type will be updated in the CRT table with cumulation parameters M,Y,K,Q etc. Now, via PCR, read monthly hours from CRT (NUM=CM9903) . If EE is not working for the current month, the return value from CRT will be 0 ,otherwise it will be >1. Based on 0 or >1, deduct the dues. Hope this helps.
Thanks
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
Thank you for your response.
WT6415 is deducting even if there is no working hours in 5th Pay period. Deduction will happen only if there is any working hours available from 1st PP to 5th PP. If there is no working hours from 1st PP to 5th PP then deduction will not happen in 5th PP.
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Deduction model can be maintained directly in IT0014.
The rule is for specific wage type 6415 , so the rule can be placed in schema as follows,
PIT ZCC9 NOAB
ZCC9
*
6415
NUM=CM9903 ---> Please read SAP documentation of NUM ,Operand C.
NUM?0
* No action required as deduction is not expected for zero or less hours
> ADDWT * -- > The deduction amount is already available in Input table , just transfer it to OT table without any change
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Bhaskar,
Currently executing the 5th Pay period (weekly payroll). The scenario is PCR should check the WT9903 stored any hours from the 1st PP to 5th PP. If any one of the PP having more than 0 working hours then the WT 6415 should deduct in the 5th PP (fixed of 20- CAD) based on the Payment model (5th, 9th, 13th, 18th Period..etc.).
I do not know how to write the PCR here to check the previous PP WT9903.
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Can you print IT and VAR table right before your rule is called and show a screenshot of it. Are you sure you have the amount in variable table for 6412 and WT 9903 has anything in the number field in IT?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
Can we read the hours from previous PP in CRT table.
Can you please guide me how to proceed further.
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
WT6415 Union due flat CPQMC is keyed in IT0014.
Yes WT9903 have working hours. Refund can be triggered by retro.
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jimson,
Thank you for the response.
Please find the below Payment model "0053" for the year 2022 and mapped to WT6415 in IT0014.
The client requirement is below
Worked 8 hours in PP01 (Pay period) therefore should be union deduction taken only in PP05. Same should be applicable till 52 Pay period.
E.g. If the Employee have working hours in any one of the pay period from PP01 to PP05, WT6415 deduction should happen in PP05 ( even though there is no working hours in PP05) .
Currently WT6415 deduction happen only when the working hours is available in PP05 (deduction period) then it is working fine.
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Lakshman,
How do you trigger union dues deduction WT6415 ? is it via infotype 0057 ?
Does WT9903 hold the monthly working hours? Variable &6415 seems to be having some amount. Can you explain how the variable is formed?
Refund can be triggered due to retro, say if few regular hours are removed for previous month system will refund the union deduction. or Say union deduction wage type is removed from infotype retro actively etc.
Thanks
Hi Experts,
Please help on the above issue..
Thank you
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
105 | |
39 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.