on 2020 Jun 18 3:53 PM
Hello
The requirement is as below.
MRO/Spare parts for preventive/breakdown maintenance are planned via Min-Max MRP and procured from vendors. These materials are common across plants. However each plant procures independently, this leads to excess inventory org.wide. So there is a requirement to first request internal stock transfer before procuring externally for managing inventory levels better.
Let me paint a scenario
Component #123 | Receiving Plant : AAA1
Regular vendor for component #123 at plant AAA1 is VENDOR1
Component #123 stock also present in plants BBB1, CCC1, DDD1
BBB1 = 30 EA
CCC1 = 40 EA
DDD1 = 30 EA
Now, Say there is a requirement for 150 for component #123 in plant AAA1
The expectation is MRP should create the following requirement elements,
Stock transfer requisition for 30 EA with supplying plant BBB1
Stock transfer requisition for 40 EA with supplyin plant CCC1
Stock transfer requisition for 30 EA with supplying plant DDD1
External Purchase requisition for 50 EA with vendor VENDOR1
To my knowledge, this is not possible via standard set up. Is there a BADI that can help achieve this requirement?
Request clarification before answering.
Hello sriramkittu169
The scenario you require can't be implemented with standard MRP as you can define only one source of supply for a material in a plant. Thus MRP can only propose movement from a single plant. Maybe you could implement source plant determination with some MRP BADIs. However you'd advise against. The implementation will definitely be cumbersome if possible at all. Instead I'd make MRP not to determine the source plant, create PReq without source of supply and leave this decision to MRP controllers. That would be pretty easy for them to check stock in supplying plants and choose the one they want. Your are talking about spare parts movement so I guess it's pretty low volume environment, you don't execute those transfers too often. Thus the manual effort would not be overwhelming.
Best regards
Dominik Tylczynski
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Dominic
Thanks for your response. Spare parts form a big part of the business, so its considerable.
My current line of research is as below,
Try and see if Quota arrangements could help with a solution.
When you post a query and give further updates, please add the content under "Comments" and not under "Answer" as you were not answering to a query but only providing additional informations as asked by the members. Also, when you add the text under Comments, it will be intimated to the person to whom you are responding whereas, if you add the text under Answer, the member will not be intimated. By the way, your above answer has been converted as comment by me.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 29 | |
| 14 | |
| 14 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.