SAFT JPK_KR_PD configuration

[Erwan_Prigent]

Hello,

I'm currently configuring the SAFT JPK_KR_PD report for a polish customer in SAP S4 Hana cloud public, and I have two questions for which I can't find answers :

- When mapping the G/L accounts with "Financial tag " and "Income tax tags", it is possible, as an option, to assign an alternative financial tag to a G/L account => in wich circumstances should this optional tag be assigned?

- My customer has raised a business case where some expenses in an invoice can be only partially relevant for tax. How should those invoices be created, so that the system considers the part relevant for tax and the part which is not relevant for tax in the report ? Should we create an item for the tax relevant part and another one for th non relevant par of the invoice ? Or maybe others settings exist for that business case ?

Thanks for your help

Erwan

[HenrikeGrtecke]

Hello, thank you for your question. It has been forwarded to the experts. Kind regards, Henrike

[Chris1973 · Accepted solution]

Good day @Erwan_Prigent 

Thank you for your question.

Have a look at these references for more details.

Mapping G/L Accounts to Financial Tags and Income Tax Tags, SAF-T Accounting Ledgers PD (SAF-T JPK_KR_PD),  SAF-T JPK_VAT with Declaration (JPK_V7M), Poland-Specific Settings

The summary is, based on my experience, it is advisable to only use alternative financial tag when you have a single G/L account that serves multiple reporting context for example partial operational vs. adjustment postings. It will allow dual classification for SAF-T without duplication G/L accounts. For standard accounts without consistent usage, leave the field blank.

When you want partially Tax-relevant invoice, it is advisable to post separate line items. One for the deductible portion and another for the non-deductible portion. Make sure each line item has its respective tax code and tag, that ensure both are correctly reflected in the JPK_KR_PD report.

Let me know if you have further questions.

Best regards

Chris

[Erwan_Prigent · Accepted solution]

Thank you @Chris1973 for your explanations. It's very clear

[Erwan_Prigent · Accepted solution]

Thank you chris for your explanations, it's very clear

[chrisobim · Accepted solution]

.

[Chris1973 · Accepted solution]

Hello @Erwan_Prigent, happy to have helped. Best Chris

[Erwan_Prigent · Accepted solution]

Hello @Chris1973, Hello When preparing G/L Accounts' mapping for JPK_KR_PD's configuration with my polish customer some more business cases were raised : 1/ Some journal entries refer to revenues/costs from both related and unrelated parties. Therefore the G/L Account can be assigned "RPAI_RKAI_POZ" as Financial Tag Report and "RPAI_RKAI_POW" as Alternative Financial Report Tag. The question is : how will the system differentiate those two kind of entries ? It seems that in a "standard polish solution", separate accounts would exist for related and unrelated parties, which is not the case in our system/chart of account configuration. What is the best practice in SAP S4 Hana Cloud Public 2/ Similarly, various tax tags can be assigned to a particular G/L account. Does this mean it is necessary to create as many entries in the mapping table as there are different combinations of G/L account, financial tag, and income tax tag?

[Erwan_Prigent · Accepted solution]

Hello @Chris1973, When preparing G/L Accounts' mapping for JPK_KR_PD's configuration with my polish customer some more business cases were raised : 1/ Some journal entries refer to revenues/costs from both related and unrelated parties. Therefore the G/L Account can be assigned "RPAI_RKAI_POZ" as Financial Tag Report and "RPAI_RKAI_POW" as Alternative Financial Report Tag. The question is : how will the system differentiate those two kind of entries ? It seems that in a "standard polish solution", separate accounts would exist for related and unrelated parties, which is not the case in our system/chart of account configuration. What is the best practice in SAP S4 Hana Cloud Public 2/ Similarly, various tax tags can be assigned to a particular G/L account. Does this mean it is necessary to create as many entries in the mapping table as there are different combinations of G/L account, financial tag, and income tax tag?

[Erwan_Prigent · Accepted solution]

Hello @Chris1973, When preparing G/L Accounts' mapping for JPK_KR_PD's configuration with my polish customer some more business cases were raised : 1/ Some journal entries refer to revenues/costs from both related and unrelated parties. Therefore the G/L Account can be assigned "RPAI_RKAI_POZ" as Financial Tag Report and "RPAI_RKAI_POW" as Alternative Financial Report Tag. The question is : how will the system differentiate those two kind of entries ? It seems that in a "standard polish solution", separate accounts would exist for related and unrelated parties, which is not the case in our system/chart of account configuration. What is the best practice in SAP S4 Hana Cloud Public 2/ Similarly, various tax tags can be assigned to a particular G/L account. Does this mean it is necessary to create as many entries in the mapping table as there are different combinations of G/L account, financial tag, and income tax tag? Thank you, Erwan