on 2016 Oct 25 1:07 PM
Hi,
as there is no possibility to use the old threads anymore, I would like to create a new, generic thread for the SAF-T Poland topic, including Starter Solution and XML creation and or SAF-T Addon.
The old threads could be found at:
SAF-T PL (Poland) Starter Solution - Custom XML creation JPK_VAT
Poland SAF-T VAT reporting due in July 2016
Continuing the idea of creationg custom XML creation programm, I would like to know how you created customer / supplier adress for example. Did you select KNA1/LFA1 and build adress using concatenate? Or did you use any FM?
Moreover it would be interessting to know which fields of FIPLD_VAT_I you used for values in XML file for official tax codes....
When I have my approach finished for JPK_VAT I will possibly write a blog about here...
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Mark
I have called ADDR_GET and concatenated STRAS and ORT01 for the address - its surely not critical; the VAT registration number is key here.
I think the VAT codes are K_10, K_11 etc matching the outbound XML
regards
Ian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Mark,
thanks for reply - it helps!
Do you have a ready solution?
Best regards. Marco
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
we have a similar Problem.
We use the Starter Solution for VAT from 01.01.2017.
From the 3 tables (FIPLD_VAT_H / FIPLD_VAT_I / FIPLD_VAT_SUM) we make one z table. This table we export to csv. With (http://www.mf.gov.pl/kontrola-skarbowa/dzialalnosc/jednolity-plik-kontrolny/-/asset_publisher/2NoO/c...) we translate to XML, check and transfer.
Can you tell me, what is: typZakupu / typSprzedazy / CelZlozenia
regards
Marco
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Marco,
as far as I know these fields should have the following meaning.
data_zakupu "Invoice Date / Document date
data_sprzedazy "Sales date, if exists and if differs from invoice issue date. Otherwise - empty field
cel_zlozenia = '1'. "Defines whether it is submission or correction of the document (1 = first hand in)
cel_zlozenia = '2'. "Defines whether it is submission or correction of the document (2 = correction)
Hope this helps. Moreover I know from SAP support that they will adopt note 2312104 to the new version (2) of JPK.
Best regards, Mark
Thx for your answer. I almost finished my first prototype of my XML Creation report.
One issue which came up during development was the question if it is right to use fields customer_id and supplier_id to decide, to which part of the XML this document belongs.
I used the following logic:
CUSTOMER_ID filled -> document belongs to sales part (K_10 to K_38) (<SprzedazWiersz typ="G">)
SUPPLIER_ID filled -> document belongs to purchase part (K_42 to K_48) (<ZakupWiersz typ="G">)
Did you do it the same way? After making this decision I saw that there are a few documents in our system, where header record contains supplier_id but I have records on position level for:
K_23 Net Amount - Intacomunity
purchase of goods
K_24
Output Tax Amount - Intracommunity purchase of goods
AND
K_44 Net Amount - The purchase Other goods
& services
K_45 Input
Tax Amount - The purchase Other goods & services
Which made be believe that there might be some mistakes in the mapping for tax codes which we made... What do you think?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
106 | |
39 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.