RE-FX IFRS16 contract valuaton posted acquisition without depreciation values

[former_member586399]

Dear All,

I am implementing flexible real estate management for our lease in contracts to be in line with new IFRS16 standard. I am just testing the process and I notice that the acquisition value got posted to the right of use asset during valuation postings without planned depreciation.

I did follow the note 2297363 to create a new depreciation key for RoU assets but I still can't figure out why I can't post depreciation.

I would appreciate your valuable advise on this issue.

Thanks in advance,

Abraham.

[former_member119845]

Hi, we have configured the Dep.to the day blank but the AFAB has not been executed for the asset in scope.

How can i solve this issue?

Regards,

Antonio

[former_member586399]

Thanks everyone for your help, the issue has been solved.

It is now working after I make the below changes.

Transaction AFAMA -> go to Depreciation key -> change the field Dep.to the day. This field should be empty.

[former_member441136]

HI Abraham,

There are sill so many things to check in configuration for Asset Accounting related.

Most probably, it should be config. issue.

Andre is right, you will have to raise this to SAP.

Regards,

Hitesh

[andre_nakratzas]

Hi Abraham, best to raise an SAP incident in this case since without system access it will be difficult to analyse.

Regards, Andre

[andre_nakratzas]

Hi, also check the following notes for detailed instructions:

2516889 - Customizing documentation: Assign Asset Transaction Types

2568784 - Evaluation of leasing contracts and integration with Asset Accounting

[former_member586399]

Hi Andre,

These notes were referenced during configuration, I can't spot anything.

Thanks.

[former_member441136]

Hi Abraham,

Could you please check one more thing, if the same Accounting Principle is assigned to your Dep. Area in Asset Accounting Config

Would like to see the Dep.Key config as well, with every assigned valuation method like Base Method LERE & Multi level method.

Make sure, you have assigned the New Dep. key to RoU Asset.

Regards,

Hitesh

[former_member286416]

Hi Hitesh,

Please find the attachments for the relevant configurations.

Thanks,

Abraham.

[former_member441136]

Hi Abraham,

Check, which Dep. Area & Accounting Principle you have assigned to the Valuation Rule.

Also make the New Dep.Key default on RoU Asset Class level in OAYZ.

New Dep. key should be created by assigning the Correct valuation methods, as given in Note 2297363.

Regards,

Hitesh

[former_member586399]

Thanks Hitesh for the reply.

I did check both configurations and are already done according to your comments, please see the attachments.

Thanks,

Abraham.

[Lakshmipathi]

When you post a query and give further updates, please add the content under "Comments" and not under "Answer" as you were not answering to a query but only providing additional informations as asked by the members. Also, when you add the text under Comments, it will be intimated to the person to whom you are responding whereas, if you add the text under Answer, the member will not be intimated. By the way, your above answer has been converted as comment by me.

[andre_nakratzas]

It depends how you have set up the integration with FI-AA. Are you using Asset Accounting or Direct Balance-Sheet Postings? In case of Asset Accounting the depreciation posting is made via FI-AA, tcode AFAB.

Regards, Andre

[former_member586399]

Thanks Andre for you reply.

I checked the view V_TIVCECTADD, it is set as 'Asset Accounting'. Could you think off any other issues?

Thanks

Abraham.

[Lakshmipathi]

When you post a query and give further updates, please add the content under "Comments" and not under "Answer" as you were not answering to a query but only providing additional informations as asked by the members. Also, when you add the text under Comments, it will be intimated to the person to whom you are responding whereas, if you add the text under Answer, the member will not be intimated. By the way, your above answer has been converted as comment by me.