on 2021 Jan 07 4:27 PM
Hello,
We are in S4 1909
We have a requirement where COA should not be printed if UD is rejected, COA's MIC values are from Inspection Char only.
We check marked "Accepted Lots" only under Restriction for Inspection Lot at Certificate Profile.
But still COA is generating for the rejected UD inspection lot
Any suggestion
Request clarification before answering.
These are the three strategies defined
How this will help me, not sure, my ask is if UD is rejected, COA should not print and data is coming from Inspection Lot MICs
Aditya
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sorry, Craig, I do not see any field in Certificate profile, like you are sugegsting
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Craig, Thanks for your comment, in QC21, input field is Inspection Lot, so why the program read data from different Inspection Lot? and profile calls for MIC not the characteristics, we do not tie MIC and Char for results.
Similarly in QC22, one passes Material and Batch, it should not look elsewhere.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Do you have all the results printing and are they all from a rejected lot? You might find it is not finding the lot but maybe using values from the batch? Or from another inspection lot that maybe you weren't realizing? Or from an accepted lot in the production chain?
I would include other qualifiers in your COA profile including the inspection lot origin and a minimum Q-score.
Craig
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Abhisek,
Our understanding is the a "Rejected UD" will have Valuation code = Not OK and Accepted UD as OK.
Our valuation code is "Not OK" i.e. it is not set as "OK"
If it something different let me know
Aditya
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Aditya,
Please check the valuation of the u.d code, the system consider the Valuation code only.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhishek Parab
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
97 | |
39 | |
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.