Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

PRCATSTMM Runtime Performance Issue

0 Kudos

We have done the hard lifting by identifying the root cause as a specific PO containing approx. 1M records in PO History table EKBE. We are asking for specific answers to the question... can PO History be deleted without adversely impacting PRCATSTMM processing? Also; since we are processing leased labor corrections for prior years, we want to ask you if that will be adversely impacted by deleting PO History? If deleting PO History is not an feasible solution for us, can we use TCODE ME87 instead?

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (0)