on 2023 Jan 11 11:10 AM
Hello Experts,
Looking forward for some clarification on table entries of COVP w.r.t maintenance order details.
Scenario:
Maintenance Order has actual cost of 60.00 USD with material issuance (261 Mvt) and amount of 60.00 USD is updated in order actual costs and R&M - Spares GL account. Once the above order is setted via KO88/KO8G, entries picked up in COVP table are observed with additional 2 line entries of 0.01 value under VERSN AGR & PCT (Snapshot enclosed for reference).
Query:
What's the logic behind these additional entries in the table ?
How to differentiate the actual cost w.r.t only material document cost ?
Looking forward for some custom JV process through Z program and Would require to read this table to validate the order settlment is completed.
Appreciate your responses.
Thanks,
Vishal R
Request clarification before answering.
Hi
Your Q : What's the logic behind these additional entries in the table ?
Ans : This is generally due to exchange rate difference, between the Material issue time and Order settlement time.
Your Q : How to differentiate the actual cost w.r.t only material document cost ?
Ans : Filter on field K_VRGNG (Business Transaction) with value COIN for material cost posted through material document. You may also see material doc number there in field AWKEY (Object key) and work order number in field AUFNR (Order).
Suggestion : Try to use views instead of direct tables for ABAP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Filter usually on version '0'
You can also filter on values of business transactions (VRGNG) for 'origin' of cost
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Vishal,
You are likely have a Parallel COGM function active in your system and those are CO delta versions for parallel valuations. That is another set of books (ledgers reflection in CO tables), normally for the Local GAAP and Tax Accounting for example, but your IFRS would be normally associated with a version 0.
Regards,
Paulo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
106 | |
39 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.