on ‎2016 Apr 20 10:34 AM
Dear All,
I need the authorization object for deleting the parked document/invoice doc
I want to restrict user id wise.
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Pravanesh,
I am thinking if you are in a similar condition I had some years ago: an user ffrom outside Financial Dept. that has authorization only to park in a process flow that account clerks are with permissions to release and post the previous parked documents created by another areas.
To authorize only park:
You can give the transaction FV60 to the user and use the authorization object F_BKPF_BLA to restrict the activity.
In the PFCG, for the role, you can restrict the activity only for 03 (display) and 77 (pre-enter) - with this set your user will only get the "park" option at FV60 - with the "save" button (Ctrl+S). Please, check also objects F_BKPF_KOA and F_BKPF_BUK
To authorize delete of parked documents:
You can also add the activity 77 (delete) for object F_BKPF_BLA to give delete authorization. But you will also need add activity "delete" for objects F_BKPF_KOA and F_BKPF_BUK.
It is a good idea to verify also if the role for this specific user in PFCG has authorization to other thansactions or documents that would giive authorization to post documents, the FB60 for instance.
This could be in conflict with the final effect you want and is usual became a little confuse: a user would want to post a pure GL document but only with permission to park an invoice at Accounts Payable Dept.
In another way: for test purposes, if you create a new role for a new user, with the sets stated above, it will work as desired: only park and delete permissions.
It means, the side effect is that your user will only have authorization to park documents. So, the good way is deal only with parking transactions.
For the last: be carefull with activity 01 (create of generate) cause with this one market, a user will also post, Even if you do not flag the activity 10 (post).
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Nilton Duque.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Pravanesh,
This is design in the system. The person who is authorized to park the documents, should also have the authorisation to post it.
In these ENJOY transaction, all these functionalities are provided like Post, save, park etc., and normally one person is the key person in the department.
In earlier versions it was separated like F-65 to park and and FBV0 was to Post the document, where as in Enjoy transaction all the authorizations is given in one transaction itself.
This is addi- tional functionality in system design. The logic followed by our developers is that the authorization to post is higher than the authorization to park.
Therefore the individual who is authorized to post will also automatically be assigned authorization to park.
a) If you want to restrict the authorization to PARK-only, you can do this by assigning activity 77 (park)to the relevant authorization object
b) you cannot restrict the authorization to POST-only (save as complete) as this requires also activity 01 (and this cannot be given without 77).
To segregate the authority to park and to post, we suggest that you either
- use the exit provided by note no 361420 to deactivate the posting/ parking button depending on users. OR
- set up a validation to prevent a users from posting/parking OR
- set up variant transactions excluding either the posting or the parking button and give the users authority for one variant transaction only.
I hope this helps to resolve the issue.
Best Regards,
Harika
SAP Product Support
SAP hotline for urgent issues-> details in note 560499
========================================================================
DID YOU KNOW?
You can find details of common issues, fixes, patches
and much more by visiting SAP moderated forums on:
SAP WIKI: http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/KhE
SAP FORUM: http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/financials
2172375 - How we search
1540080 - How to search for KBs, KBAs, SAP Notes, product documentation, and SCN
2081285 - How to get best results from an SAP search?
========================================================================
Ideas for improvement?
Starting from April 25, 2016 customers have the opportunity to address their
requests for improvement of existing functionality in a Customer Connection Focus
Topic project for ERP Financials.
Please follow the link to Focus Topic ERP Financials 2017 in the List of Improvement Projects.
(Short registration is necessary to access the project workspace.)
Lean more about SAP’s Influencing Programs on https://influence.sap.com/
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 39 | |
| 20 | |
| 15 | |
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.