on 2019 Oct 16 5:21 AM
Hello,
The User has maintained Max. Cond. Value of -44.621.486 IDR in Condition Type of Discount ZAD2.
The last 3 Sales Order (let's say Sales Order X, Y and Z) has Maximum Amount = X, ZAD2 Condition Value = 0, which is correct. The value of S071-KWERT is -44.621.486 as well, which is correct.
Here comes the strange part.
The Billing documents from Sales Order X, Y and Z has Maximum Amount = Y for ZAD2 which is incorrect, ZAD2 Condition Value is not 0, which means, the Billing documents price is smaller than Sales Order due to ZAD2 is not zero in Billing Document. The value of S061-KWERT_K is -46.961.486 IDR.
There is a different amount of 2.340.000 IDR.
Pricing Type from DO to Billing type = D - Copy pricing elements unchanged.
SAP version is 4.6C.
No Sales Order is being created at almost same time, every Sales Order has at least 15s difference of created time.
No return document has been made either from those Billing documents as well.
The changes log of Sales Order X, Y and Z is that those Sales Order has been released through VKM1 with confirmed qty changes after they're released.
I've checked SAP Notes 615370 but found no explanation about this.
The questions:
1. How to fix the Condition Value amount of ZAD2 in Billing documents?
2. How to prevent this to happen again?
Regards,
Trisno S.
Help others by sharing your knowledge.
AnswerRequest clarification before answering.
It turns out that the admin whom created the Billing did carry out new pricing due to price change - which inadvertently causing ZAD2 value to appear as not zero, because maximum condition value is ignored in Billing process when new pricing is triggered, according to SAP Notes 615370 point C.
As to prevent it, the idea is to make ZVF01 with Update button in Condition tab to be locked.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Share the screen shots for that condition type in billing after clicking the blue lens at the bottom left screen and Analysis tab. Also, it is not clear why you were checking S061-KWERT since normally, we look for VBAP and VBRP tables.
Also have a look at OSS notes 88625 and 2504500
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
130 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.