on 2025 Apr 03 8:26 AM
Dear All,
We are facing a condition were we need to remove Inactive objects within the role. You can suggest us to delete or maintain it from SU24 with check indicator "NO". But either of the case is not acceptable and wanted to find if there is any new way for this.
For more clarification: We maintain an object S_SECPOL for SU01 in SU24 for Security team and added in Role1. But the same object might not be necessary for Basis (in rare Basis user maintenance access) and added in Role 2 with S_SECPOL inactive.
In this case for Role 2 we are not supposed to inactive S_SECPOL object either we cannot maintain check no for same transaction SU01 in SU24 as it might effect Role 1.
If there is any alternate, please suggest me.
Request clarification before answering.
Why dont you use SU24 variants? You can create a variant of SU01 for basis that has NO enabled. It means it wont effect the security roles as they have the standard SU24 proposal.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 40 | |
| 21 | |
| 15 | |
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.