How to resolve error FF891 G/L account item without tax code in document XX with deffered taxes

[former_member674303]

Hi

We are getting error message FF891 'G/L account item without tax code in document XX with deffered taxes' in VF01 tcode. Error is observed after deferred tax functionality is activated for Indian customer after recent TCS legal requirement.

We have referred to error FF891 in SAP Note 1800344, however we are unable to resolve issue. As I understand error occurs as there are some lines where tax code is blank.

SD Pricing procedure has some statistical condition types in routine, perhaps because of that tax code is not automatically determined. We tried creating substitution in OBBH and attached user exit, to update tax code in G/L line where it is blank, However this did not work as well.

Other note checked 1811030. 2068947

Can you please suggest specific inputs to resolve error.

Regards

Kapil

[Lakshmipathi]

If the issue is related to GST India, please share your pricing procedure configuration. It seems, the root cause is there

[sanilbhandari]

Hi kapilmehta2

Please check the GL Accounts in question. In FS00, under the control data tab, make sure that the check mark is maintained for posting without taxes allowed.

This should resolve the issue.

Thanks & Regards

Sanil Bhandari

[former_member674303]

Hi Sanil

Thanks for your feedback. However 'posting w/o tax allowed' is ticked, in Revenue & other lines involved.

[sanilbhandari]

Hi kapilmehta2

You have mentioned that there are some statistical condition types in pricing procedure. What is the condition category of these condition types? It should not be tax (Value =D).

Thanks & Regards

Sanil Bhandari

[former_member674303]

Hi Sanil

These are not tax condition types.

Regards

Kapil

[sanilbhandari]

Hi kapilmehta2

Please check if you have the below OSS Note in your system

https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/978968

Thanks & regards

Sanil Bhandari

[former_member674303]

Hi Sanil

Thanks for your feedback.

This note is not relevant for our system, as we are on higher level of SAP_APPL than this note.

Regards

Kapil