cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Finance issue

gaobo
Explorer
0 Kudos
766

1.When I start using the 5MQ,when I use the scheme about 'Make to Order',I discover the G/L Account is not correct.Details are given below. 2.First,in 'Accounting 1' of my meterial view,the Valuation Class is '2200'and the 'BSX' Account is 14050201,the 'VC:Sale Ord. Stk' is '7920' and the 'BSX' Account is 14070001. 3.Second,when I use the scheme 'Make to Order',materials received after producion, a material certificate was generated and an accounting document was produced. 4.Third,the account document is Dr:14070001(BSX)(7920)  Cr:50012102(GBB),the  material document's Movement type is '101' and Special Stock is 'E'. 5.Fifth,when I make the material movement from 'E' to 'E' by the movement type'687',an accounting document is generated,it is Dr:14070001(BSX)(7920)  Cr:14070001(BSX)(7920). 6.The results above are not what I wish. 7.I wish that the document is Dr:14050201(BSX)(2200)  Cr:50012102(GBB) when I do the material movement by movement type '101' and special stock 'E' and the document is Dr:14070001(BSX)(7920)  Cr:14050201(BSX)(2200) when I do the material movement by movement type'687' and special stock 'E'. 8.Of course,when I choose the movement type'687',the special stock can not 'E'.But,I need the result about the accounting document. 9.How could I do this? Whether this product can be implemented?

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Javier_del-Peso
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

 Hi gaobo

The account determination is configured and pre deliver to work according to the best practices (Sell from Stock with Valuated Stock in Transit - 5MQ).

Review the purpose of the scope item and its configuration. Maybe this is not what you need to implement as it's not a Make to order scenario.

Process Navigator - SAP for Me

You can maintain automatic account determination in SSCUI 100297 but is not recommended unless you know what you are doing. 

Regards,

Javier del Peso

 

Answers (0)