on 2012 Jan 23 9:40 AM
Hello experts.
There is an issue with the transaction types while posting of an unplanned depreciation. Using transactions ABAA and AFAB I get different transaction types in the posting documents.
In transaction ABAA I use the TT 650 (field BWASL). After using transaction AFAB, the FI-document shows the TT 501 (field ANBWA).
For me it is now interesting, where these TT are linked to each other, I don't find any customizing-possibiltiy for this...
Thanks for your help...
Best regards
Roland
Please check AO78 for transaction types of unplanned depreciation.
Also check below path
SPRO > Financial Accounting (New) > Asset Accounting > Transactions > Specify Default Transaction Types
Rgds
Murali. N
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hy, thanks for your answers.
But my problem is not the linkage between "normal" transaction type and consolidation transaction type. The consolidation transaction type is another field in the posting (field BEWAR).
I am looking for the link between the different Asset Transaction Types BSEG-ANBWA (in FI document after depreciation run) and ANBZ-BWASL (which is filled manually in the unplanned depreciation transaction ABAA in Asset Accounting).
Best regards
Roland
Hi Roland,
For each transaction there are default transaction types, if you go through the following paths you can find
SPRO > Financial Accounting (New) > Asset Accounting > Transactions > Specify Default Transaction Types
SPRO > Financial Accounting (New) > Asset Accounting > Transactions > Determine Transaction Types for Internal Transactions
Rgds
Murali. N
Hy!
These two paths are not solving my problem unfortunately.
"Specify Default Transaction Types" gives proposals for different asset transactions e.g. for manual unplanned depreciation TT 640 '(in field "ANBZ-BWASL" in transaction ABAA), which I am overwriting with TT 650 in my case.
"Determine Transaction Types for Internal Transactions" defines the default TT for internal processes e.g. acquisition of assets. Unplanned dep. is not part of this path.
I am not sure if my problem is fully unterstandable, so I try to explain it again:
I have to carry out an unplanned depreciation using transaction ABAA, here I use the TT 650 in field "ANBZ-BWASL". That works fine and without any problems. Next step is to carry out the depreciation run (transaction AFAB) which also works fine. Last step is checking the FI-document posted on the basis of depreciation. And here, the problem occurs! In the posting, there is a different field for asset transaction type (field BSEG-ANBWA) which is filled with a different TT 502.
And this is my question: Where do I find this link between the asset transaction type 650 (my entry) and the asset transaction type 502 (result in FI-document; both are TT for unplanned depreciation). In Customizing this 2 TT are only different in the field "Cannot be used manually" ("XABUCH").
Regards
Roland
Now I found a Customizing path where you set transaction types for special asset processes:
asset accounting --> special valuation --> preparations for consolidation --> specify transaction types for proportional value adjustments
For transaction type 500 "post depreciation" you can set different transaction types for different asset transactions (processes). In case of unplanned depreciation you find the transaction type 502, which is in the FI documents (mentioned above). So, I tried to change this transaction type and it now works as expected.
But for me, there is still the question, why this setting is needed and I don't find a good explanation (customizing help is not really helpful for me). In my opinion, the used asset transaction type (in transaction ABAA) and the consolidation transaction type should be enough.
Am I wrong?
Regards
Roland
Hi,
You can check the assignment between regular TType with consolidation TTypes in AO78.
Regards,
Srinu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
113 | |
9 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.