Conflict_check phase taking a long time.

[Former Member]

Hi all,

We are upgrading our ECC 6.0 system to ehp 6.So we started the upgrade on a sandbox system for testing purpose . In the PREP_EXTENSION/CONFLICT_CHECK initially i got a timeout error so i increased the parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time" from 600 to 1200 but still i got the error .So i increased the value to 1600 and then to 6000 and  still got the error. so finally set the value to 0. Now the phase is continuing without error but it has been 25 hours and still it has not gone beyond that phase.I checked SM50 and i found that sequential read and insert is being performed continuously on three tables OCSCMPLOBJ,E071K and EO71. I have even updated the statistics of these tables but still no effect.

Our Database is Oracle 11g .OS is Solaris SPARC 64 bit.Running this on a zone with server configuration 32 GB RAM and 64 CPU cores.

Appreciate any pointer to this issue.

Thanks and Regards,

Venkatesh Iyer

[Former Member]

Hi All,

Thanks for the replies guys.After 4 days of wait the phase is completed.I will try all of your suggestions when i start the upgrade in development.

Thanks and Regards,

Venkatesh Iyer

[Vivekjais]

Hi Venkatesh,

[Former Member]

Hi,

Try to have an SQL trace and see if helps.

How many entries you have for table E071K and E071.

Try to rebuild the index and see how it goes for these table.

used the below command for these two table index.

alter index sapsr3."E071K~0" rebuild online;

find all the index for these table and rebuild them and see how it goes.

Thanks

Rishi abrol

[willi_eimler]

Hi Venkatesh,

I refreshed the statistics for the following tables:

SE38-> RSANAORA
(DEFAULT)
TADIR
TFDIR
SMODILOG
VRSD
E070
DOKIL
E071
OCSCMPLOBJ

For my EHP6 upgrade the CONFLICT_CHECK phase ran 1,5 h.

Best regards
Willi Eimler

[Reagan]

Hello

For sure there will be logs at the OS level in the /upgrade_directory/abap/log

Please check them or provide them

Regards

RB

[Former Member]

Could you please paste CONFLCHK.LOG log here? Also, could you please check what this process doing in SM66 ?

Thanks,

Sunny